Love/Hate: Dead or Alive 4

Welcome back to the Dead or Alive Love/Hate series! In this entry, we’ll be looking at Dead or Alive 4. This was the first Dead or Alive game following Xtreme Beach Volleyball, and was the first mainline entry to get an M-rating. Was this deserved? And how would the perception of Xtreme alter the series going forward? Read on to find out…

Dead or Alive 4 is another entry which only had one release, this time on the Xbox 360 shortly after the console’s launch. I actually snagged a copy just for this Love/Hate series!

Love

  • Stages – While the stage hazards are a major come-down from Dead or Alive 3, 4‘s stages still show a lot of creativity and character. You’ve got a stage where you fight in the streets of Las Vegas and have to avoid traffic (or push your opponent into it to get some massive damage; I’ve had multiple matches end with one, or even both, fighters getting run over and it’s always hilarious when it happens). There’s a stage in a crowded market where you can smash through stalls, or fall down to a beach and continue the fight there. There’s a cool stage in the savannahs of Africa, with all sorts of wildlife roaming about. There’s a fight on the steps of a mountain temple with monkeys running around and a tomb at the base if you fall down enough sets of stairs. There’s a freaking dinosaur stage, with lots of smaller dinosaurs moving around inside the combat area as obstacles. There’s just lots of creativity on display, which helps make every fight unique, and gives DOA4 more of a “world tour” vibe.
  • The Story – Dead or Alive 4‘s story mode is a bit of a mixed bag, but overall a big improvement on its predecessors, and a rather epic culmination to the entire narrative to this point. Kasumi, the Mugen Tenshin clan, the Haijimon sect, and the Hayabusa clan are sick of DOATEC fucking around with their ninja affairs. As a result, they go on the offensive to destroy DOTATEC and stop them from unleashing Alpha-152, a super-powered clone of Kasumi. While the fourth tournament is going on, they attack and begin tearing the entire company down in true ninja style. Meanwhile, Helena is secretly enacting her own revenge against the company to help ensure its complete destruction. We actually get a decent sense of this story from the in-game narrative for once, due to some small changes to the campaign structure. Each character’s campaign plays differently in this game, and each one ends with different final bosses. This really incentivizes playing every story campaign so that you can piece together the plot (not to mention that you can’t get the true ending until you’ve completed all other characters’ stories). All that said, the story is only really good for Ayane, Hayate, Ryu, Zack, and Helena (especially Helena, her ending is downright awesome). Still, considering how epic the main plot is, I can excuse a few duds.
    • Special shout-out to Zack’s ending. It is ridiculous and needs to be seen to be believed. I love how tongue-in-cheek it is, blending pulp adventure, Ray Harryhausen stop motion (!), and goddamn Super Sentai, all with a generous helping of slapstick comedy and Dead or Alive‘s own signature fan service. What’s not to love?

Mixed

  • Difficulty – Admittedly, this is a pretty weak mixed opinion here, but I feel like it’s worth noting. On normal difficulty, Dead or Alive 4 is the hardest game in the franchise since the original. In Dead or Alive 2, I could consistently finish a character’s campaign in about ten minutes. In Dead or Alive 4, a game with about the same number of fights to get through, a single campaign run would easily take me between twenty to thirty minutes (or even forty minutes if I’m stuck playing as a character I don’t like). I just found myself getting K.O.’d so many times as the fights get progressively harder. I am not sure exactly why this game was so much of a difficulty spike, but I believe that there’s been one big change made which really contributes: the window in which to execute a successful hold seems to have been reduced significantly. I used to be able to consistently land holds in DOA2 and 3 with relative ease. However, in this game, I found that I was having to be much more precise with my timing to land one. From a high-level standpoint, I can see how this makes sense. However, it ultimately means that holds are less viable and reliable, affecting the balance of the strikes-throws-holds triangle in the process. This is an issue, because the harder opponents will spam holds and/or critical stuns, which will let them effectively stun-lock your health bar to oblivion. Your only real counter to this? Holds… I sure hope you can git gud with your predictive and reactive skills, champ. All that said, I did kind of appreciate the satisfaction that comes from defeating a tough opponent, but the frustration to get there kind of balances that out.
  • New Characters – For the first time in this franchise, I’m very mixed on the new characters introduced here in Dead or Alive 4:
    • We’ve got Kokoro, who is the definition of wasted potential. She is potentially interesting: she’s Helena’s secret half-sister, and she’s a geisha who secretly has a passion for martial arts, much to her mother’s disapproval. Potentially interesting ideas here, but nothing is made of it in her story (and, to make it worse, Kokoro has gotten zero development since). Oh, and to make matters worse, I despise her fighting style/move-set in-game. Easily one of my least-favourite characters in the franchise, she’s so dull all-round.
    • Then there’s Eliot. He is a young man who Gen Fu has taken on as an apprentice. Mechanically, that makes him a reskin of Gen Fu. However, narratively, he’s… alright. He’s naïve, polite, eager to learn, and seeking the approval of his master, but uncertain how to achieve it. Decent, but not a lot to latch onto.
    • Finally, there’s Lisa, who simply beggars belief. She was actually introduced in DOAXBV, but they’ve fleshed out her character and gone to some insane directions with her. She’s a DOATEC scientist, and she’s the one who performed the mind-control experiments on Hayate in Dead or Alive 2, and she’s also a secret lucha libre wrestler on the side!? It’s bonkers, but I kind of love how ridiculous it is… unfortunately, her character gets basically no development or anything interesting to do in the narrative. She does play really well though, I love how fast and fluid her fighting style is, so overall she’s probably my favourite (mostly) new character.
  • The Xtreme-ification of Dead or Alive – As the first M-rated mainline Dead or Alive game, you can feel how Xtreme Beach Volleyball and the upcoming Xtreme 2 were influencing how these games were made. Sex had always been a part of the marketing of these games, but the actual in-game sexiness was largely confined to boob physics and some cleavage, but it never really felt egregious in any way. DOA4 is the first time where I can say that Team Ninja were consciously pushing this to make overt suggestive content a core part of this series’ image:
    • For one thing, the in-game costumes have started getting over-the-top. I can maybe justify Tina and Lisa fighting in a bikini top as being in-character for a wrestler, but Christie’s outfits are just ridiculous. Her main costume has her wearing an open jacket with no top on underneath, while another has her basically decked out in bondage gear. Not only that, but her entire ending is a video of her dancing in a strip club so she can assassinate some guy. I get that she’s a femme fatale, but these are clearly just pure fanservice at this point.
    • Some of the characters’ endings also seem to have been screwed over due to the push for more fanservice. Kasumi and Hitomi’s endings both have extended sequences of them prancing around topless (with convenient censoring to avoid any actual nudity), which might be a cheap thrill, but doesn’t provide a satisfying end to their campaigns’ storylines at all (this is especially bad for Kasumi, since she play a major role in the main plot and deserved a proper ending). Then there’s Leifang’s ending, which features her shirt tearing open due to her boobs being too big, and then she accidentally (?) gets groped by a guy on the train. It’s… uh, something.
    • Oh, and the boob physics in this game are way less subtle than they were in the last couple games. As a result, they actually look less natural here as they’re jiggling away compared to most of the other games in the franchise.

Hate

  • Stagnation – Dead or Alive 4 is the first time where it feels like Dead or Alive is not giving its all. The game still has basically the same features as Dead or Alive 2 and plays very similarly. Like a lot of the very early Xbox 360 games, it doesn’t look much better than an original Xbox game either. This may have been down to the anime art style having reached the limits of what it could realistically achieve, but this is the first time I wasn’t really blown away by the graphics. In a lot of ways, it’s just “more of the same”.

Dead or Alive 4 is a bit of a mixed bag. On the one hand, it’s really just more of the same for the franchise. The franchise’s formula is still fun in its own right though, so it’s not necessarily a bad thing, but you can feel that the franchise has plateaued and isn’t sure where to go from here. If not for the story acting as a big culmination, Dead or Alive 4 would probably be a far less enjoyable experience.

If you liked this article…

I hate ads. You hate ads. In order to stop polluting my site with obtrusive and annoying ads, I’ve elected to turn them off on IC2S. That said, writing still takes time and effort. If you enjoyed what you read here today and want to give a token of appreciation, I’ve set up a tip jar. Feel free to donate if you feel compelled to and I hope you enjoyed the article! 🙂

Love/Hate: Dead or Alive Xtreme Beach Volleyball

Welcome back to the Dead or Alive Love/Hate series! In this entry, we’re covering the first game in the notorious Dead or Alive spin-off franchise, Dead or Alive Xtreme Beach Volleyball. What can I say about this game that it doesn’t say for itself? Well, if you were interested in video games at the time this came out, there’s a good chance that this was your first impression of Dead or Alive. I had never heard of the series before, but I distinctly remember getting second-hand embarrassment every time I saw the box art for this game at the rental store. Despite that, the game reviewed shockingly well and this particular game has a pretty good reputation even to this day. How does this game hold-up in the face of its follow-ups? Read on to find out…

Once again, there’s only been one release of this game, that being on the original Xbox, so no need to go over alternate versions this time…

Ok, I don’t usually comment on the images I use in the Love/Hate series… but I really have to here. This cover art was absolutely ridiculous back in the day. Did it get this game attention? Yes. But I would argue that this one image single-handedly changed how the public saw Dead or Alive.

Love

  • The Volleyball – DOAXBV seems like it’s an April Fool’s joke born out of all the jokes about this series’ sexy girl marketing. It would be like if Nier suddenly announced a wet t-shirt contest spin-off, or if Final Fantasy announced a female-only mud-wrestling game. In a lot of respects, this is kind of a joke brought to life, but Team Ninja execute that joke properly by making the volleyball legitimately enjoyable to play. The systems aren’t super deep, but there’s enough here that it’s fun to learn the ropes and playing a few rounds is quick, easy, and enjoyable.
  • Very Relaxing Atmosphere – One thing that the DOAX games have always really excelled at is making you feel like you’re on vacation. Too many games can just feel like a chore to play, but DOAXBV seems designed to have you just chill and take it easy. In this regard, DOAXBV may be the most relaxing entry in this spin-off series. Since the only real activities are volleyball or lounging around, it doesn’t feel like you’re wasting time if you choose to skip a match and just watch your chosen girl taking it easy for a few seconds.
  • Licensed Soundtrack – While I’m not really a fan of this game’s pop soundtrack, it’s hard to deny that the fairly large playlist of licensed tracks really enhance the relaxing atmosphere of the game. It’s also pretty cool that you can add or remove tracks from the playlist in-game.
  • Exhibition Mode – It’s pretty cool that this game gives you the option to ignore all the constraints of a full vacation and just play a custom round of volleyball by yourself or with a friend. It’s also pretty cool that you can choose any of the girls for this mode and they’ll have any outfits that you’ve unlocked for them available to choose from. This mode is also particularly notable since none of the other Xtreme games feature this mode.
  • Graphics – A game like this lives and dies based on its graphics, and it’s no exaggeration to say that DOAXBV holds up. The character models are as good as they were in DOA3 and the anime-like art style of these games helps to make this game still look pretty impressive more than twenty years after it released (the sand physics are especially cool to see in real-time).
  • The Sexy Aspects Are… Tasteful? – Look, the Dead or Alive series, and especially the Xtreme spin-offs, have a reputation for being kind of creepy. Leaving aside the fact that Kasumi and Ayane are both underage, the sexy aspects of DOAXBV are… not that bad? I’m serious, there’s a voyeuristic element to the game, but it doesn’t really cross any objectionable lines in my opinion (again, ignoring that two of the characters are, according to the game designers, technically underage…). The girls are all on vacation, having fun, and playing volleyball while trying out various swimsuits. We just happen to get a look into this world to see what they’re up to, but we’re not intruding, or putting them in uncomfortable situations, or anything like that. As far as these kinds of games go, it’s downright wholesome to see and makes the game a lot easier to recommend.

Hate

  • Content Wears Thin – As I said earlier, there is very little to do in DOAXBV: you’ve got volleyball, relaxing, pool hopping, buying items, or heading to the casino at nighttime. That’s it. This is a fourteen day vacation, split up into morning, day, evening segments. Volleyball’s fun, but I was growing a bit bored of it quickly. Like I said earlier, it feels like Team Ninja knew this and threw in sexy relaxation scenes to break up the monotony, but well-before the end of the vacation, I was getting pretty bored. This is the sort of game that benefits from short play sessions, because the repetition really starts to sour the experience quickly.
  • Dating Sim Elements – Easily the worst part about DOAXBV (and this spin-off series in general) are the dating sim elements. Every girl has certain items that they like and, if you want to partner with them for volleyball or have them accept some of your unique swimwear, you need to gift them a couple times to make them like you. I just hate how rigid this system is: you either go in blind and basically just play a complete guessing game, or you look at a guide and it becomes a game of colour by numbers. It’s so tedious. Worst of all, you have to engage with it for a couple reasons: 1) in order to give character-specific bikinis to the other girls, and 2) if you lose a couple matches, then your partner will ditch you the next morning and you’ll have to find someone else to join you. Of course, you could just choose to play the rest of the game solo, but then you will be completely unable to play any more volleyball (which is where all the content in the game is).
  • Tarnished the Series’ Reputation – I’ve long held the opinion that DOAXBV was the reason the entire franchise gained a negative reputation, but now that I’ve played through all the games to this point, I’ve pretty much confirmed my suspicions. DOA3 was pushing the envelope a bit, both in terms of in-game fanservice and its marketing, it still was certainly no worse than other fighters of the time. However, it’s like I said up-top: that cover art for DOAXBV made way more people aware of this franchise, and their first impression was that these games were porn. Even the title itself promises something far more salacious than what we actually get here. And, unfortunately, this perception would stick to the series going forward, to the point where even the developers embraced it.

For a joke brought to life, Dead or Alive Xtreme Beach Volleyball isn’t a terrible time. It’s enjoyable enough in short stints, but the lack of content really makes the game wear thin quickly. However, it provides enough of a foundation that you can see how they could potentially improve and expand upon its ideas in future follow-ups. Boy howdy, it sure is convenient that I just got amnesia, so I get to be excited to see where these spin-offs go in the future…

If you liked this article…

I hate ads. You hate ads. In order to stop polluting my site with obtrusive and annoying ads, I’ve elected to turn them off on IC2S. That said, writing still takes time and effort. If you enjoyed what you read here today and want to give a token of appreciation, I’ve set up a tip jar. Feel free to donate if you feel compelled to and I hope you enjoyed the article! 🙂

Love/Hate: Dead or Alive 3

Welcome back to the Dead or Alive Love/Hate series! In this entry, we’re going to be covering the next entry in the series, Dead or Alive 3. Having never owned an Xbox, and not being very good at fighting games, this game was about as far off my radar as could be at the time of its release. However, I’d argue that Dead or Alive 3 represents the franchise at its apex of critical and commercial success, before the series’ reputation turned into a joke and Xbox exclusivity went from a selling-point to tanking its global market share. With that said, would DOA3 be able to live up to the success of its predecessor? Read on to find out…

Unlike the other games we’ve covered so far, there is only one release of Dead or Alive 3 and that’s on the original Xbox (a launch title again, no less). So, naturally, that’s the game I played here for this analysis. Enjoy.

Love

  • New Characters – A new entry in a fighting game means new characters, and there are some pretty great additions here in Dead or Alive 3:
    • Hitomi – First off, we’ve got my main for this franchise, Hitomi. She’s great, what can I say? She’s pretty, but not to a gaudy degree like some other characters in this franchise. She’s strong, having mastered karate at her father’s dojo and now seeking to prove herself on the world stage. She’s also very playful, but has a fierce confidence to her which makes her instantly likeable. She also clearly has feelings for Hayate, who she aided when he lost his memories. Now that Hayate has taken up his place as leader of the Mugen Tenshin clan, they are unable to reconcile the relationship they had before, and this somewhat tragic and sympathetic characterization is a driving force for Hitomi going forward. Plus she’s just plain fun to play. The fact that she makes her debut here gives DOA3 a major boost in my eyes.
    • Then there’s Brad Wong. Character-wise, he’s not actually all that interesting or important. However, what makes him standout is his fighting style. He’s a full-on alcoholic drunken master and this lends him an incredibly distinctive and fun fighting style which can be difficult to face-off against.
    • Then there’s Christie, one of the more important secondary characters in the series. She is an assassin who has been hired to kill Helena (and we later find out is responsible for killing her mother as well). She is also one of the more overtly-sexualized characters in the series (alongside Tina Armstrong), which fits in with her femme fatale characterization. Her fighting style is also perfect for her character, showing her extreme precision with which she dispatches her foes, reminiscent of a snake striking.
    • Hayate also makes his official debut here in DOA3. He was technically in DOA2 as Ein, but now that he has his memories back, he actually plays completely differently, so I think it’s fair enough to note him separately. Plot-wise, he’s pretty important to the overall saga, even if he’s probably the least-interesting of the new characters in terms of personality and playstyle.
  • Graphics – It might seem like a no-brainer that DOA3 would be better-looking than DOA2, but you really have to see this game in motion to appreciate it. Fidelity everywhere has been improved by a lot, but the most impressive things are the little details. The stage “Snow” is a snow-covered forest and, my God, the snow effects are legitimately impressive. The snow deforms as you move through it, stays that way for the duration of the fight and, if you get knocked into a tree, then blankets of snow will fall down from the treetops. The ninja temple also has a mirror-reflection on the floor which looks insanely good even today in 2024. DOA2‘s presentation was great, albeit with some rough edges that were easy to ignore. With this art style and the additional details, DOA3 just looks downright amazing, full-stop.
  • Stage Design – Another key way in which DOA3 improves on its predecessor is in its stages. Rather than just designing more stage hazards, Team Ninja have gotten creative with the types of stages you can battle on. For example, the “Forest” stage is very large and dotted with trees throughout which you can fight around and then knock your opponent into to extend a combo or cause additional damage. It completely shakes up the “flat square with walls” stages that you usually run into in 3D fighters and makes positioning and move choice extremely important. Then there’s the “Ice Cave”, where you can launch enemies into large icicles, which shatter on impact, changing the stage itself in the process. Then there’s the usual falling stage hazards and walls which we’re used to, but the added variety is extremely welcome. Even the more “traditional” stages like “Aqua Palace”, which takes place in an underwater glass dome, are absolutely gorgeous to look at. DOA3 has, hands down, some of the best stages in the series and they make every battle just that much more interesting.
  • Ayane – I need to give Ayane a special shout-out in this game. Dead or Alive games struggle to create compelling narratives, but they really managed to craft a satisfying story here for Ayane. As I said in DOA2‘s entry, Ayane is very tragic. Despite being half-sisters, Kasumi was treated as a princess, whereas Ayane was shunned by her clan for being conceived during the rape of her mother. This led to resentment between her and her half-sister and she threw herself into the way of the ninja to gain the love of her adopted father, Genra. In the previous two games, Ayane spent her entire narrative chasing after Kasumi to try to kill her for abandoning their village. This, of course, ended in failure each time. However, in this game, Genra has been captured by DOATEC and experimented on, turning him into a living weapon. Despite the insistence of Hayate and Ryu Hayabusa that they will deal with Genra, Ayane views it as her duty to put him out of his misery, both as his protégé and his daughter. This gives her a much more compelling narrative and, when she ultimately succeeds, it’s a sad moment. You’re happy to see Ayane triumph for once, but her ending shows her crying over what she had to do and the uncertainty of her future in the wake of this event. It’s genuinely heartbreaking and it really cements her as one of my favourite characters in this franchise.

Hate

  • Genra Fight – Tengu was a really weird final boss for DOA2, but he at least played like a fitting final boss for that game. Genra, though? Genra is fucking bullshit. You reach the final boss and then suddenly the camera angle of the game changes to over-the-shoulder (despite the controls remaining entirely the same, so it throws your entire perception and orientation off). Genra’s entire gameplay involves pushing you back as far as possible and then hitting you with one of three ranged attacks: a sweeping flamethrower, a blast wave, and an energy ball. You have to perform very specific actions to avoid getting hit by these attacks (either a ducking move to avoid the flamethrower or move IMMEDIATELY when he starts the attack to outrun the sweep, and side-stepping to avoid the wave and energy ball), which effectively turns this stage of the fight into more of an action game or platformer than a traditional fighter. Then, when you close the distance with him, he has a very limited moveset, which can be easily cheesed by holds, which will put you behind him so you can get some more hits in. Oh, and if you launch him into the air with one of your attacks, when he hits the ground it creates a blast which damages you and knocks you backwards, putting you back into the “dodge ranged attacks” part of the fight again. It’s infuriating, punishes characters with movesets which have a lot of launches (like Helena), and just encourages you to cheese the hell out of the fight rather than actually… y’know, playing a fighting game normally. It’s a terrible way to end the game and single-handedly lowers Dead or Alive 3 overall in my estimation.
  • Story Presentation – The story presentation in Dead or Alive 3 is pretty much identical to its predecessor (immediately thrown into fights, you get a short cutscene between them sometimes, repeat). Considering that the narrative presentation was one of my few complaints about Dead or Alive 2, it’s pretty disappointing to see it remain unchanged here. The only substantial difference is that each character gets a longer ending cutscene… however, this is also a disappointment, because most of these “endings” are extremely unsatisfying. The aforementioned ending for Ayane is the one big exception, and the endings for Tina, Zack, and Gen Fu are good enough, but for the rest…
    • First of all, there’s the ending which don’t really communicate anything new: Kasumi’s still on the run from her clan. Jann Lee’s still out here fighting people to become the strongest. Leifang goes and beats up some yakuza thugs who tried to kidnap a kid… good on you, but I don’t think this is something you were incapable of before the tournament? Bass’s motorcycle breaks down in the desert and he smashes it, tries to fix it, and gets mad when Tina passes him in a sports car. And then there’s Leon… he goes to a desert oasis and sees a mirage of his dead lover.
    • Then there’s the endings which feel more like an introductory cutscene: Hitomi reminisces about besting her father and leaving the dojo to find stronger foes to overcome. Bayman remembers how his parents died in a war and then goes out to kill Donovan… which was supposed to be his entire motivation throughout this game already, so shouldn’t his ending have him actually trying to do the deed? Then there’s Ryu’s ending, which sees him fishing and then he gets a new ninja assignment and leaves… there’s a cyclical, professional quality to it, but it’s kind of unsatisfying as an ending compared to if it was the introduction to the character.
    • Then there’s the endings which are just a big “nothing”: Brad Wong’s entire ending is just him meditating. Hayate’s is similar, he just stands around in a tree and then jumps out to go do ninja shit.
    • Oh, and then there’s the ending which are literally just fanservice. Helena is on her boat in a red bikini and then jumps into the ocean to swim with dolphins while the camera luxuriates on her body. And then there’s Christie, who has a shower scene with rear nudity and then struts around her apartment in her underwear. It’s by far the most overt, in-game fanservice in the franchise up to this point. I guess you could make the argument that it’s a decent “reward” for the player to unlock, but narratively, these are very unsatisfying endings.
  • Sparse Unlocks – One of the ways that DOA games incentivize trying out every character and game mode is by rewarding the player with unlockable characters and costumes. At the very least, you usually get a costume as a reward when you complete a character’s story mode. Dead or Alive 3 bucks this trend in the worst way. There are very few unlockables in this game: usually around one costume per character, and you can also unlock Ein as a playable character. Making matters worse is that there are more costumes available, but they were confined to DLC and/or an Official Xbox Magazine bonus disc, meaning that they’re basically unobtainable today.
  • Xbox Exclusivity – This one is a bit complicated, but I think that Team Ninja’s move to Xbox exclusivity starting with this game really knee-capped the franchise’s future. Let’s break this down:
    • First of all, I do have to admit that the Xbox era was a creative and financial boon for Team Ninja. Dead or Alive 3 and the Ninja Gaiden games were major successes for the studio, so I can see why sticking with Xbox seemed like a no-brainer. However, history has shown that the Xbox brand fared incredibly poorly outside North America, so an Asian developer like Team Ninja was ultimately limiting its reach and appeal by sticking with the console for as long as they did (this can also be seen in how the Ninja Gaiden games ended up getting ported to PlayStation within a couple years of release). I suspect that more than ten years of Xbox exclusivity shrank the market share for Dead or Alive, especially compared to its competition.
    • The controllers for the first couple Xbox consoles were also known for not being very good for fighting games, which likely further dis-incentivized people from trying these games out or from taking them seriously compared to their competition.

One of the biggest struggles that Dead or Alive 3 has is that it lives in the shadow of its predecessor. On the one hand, it’s nearly identical in terms of modes and gameplay, with the only major difference being that full 3D movement is much easier to perform. DOA2 already played well, so this means that DOA3 also plays well. However, you expect a sequel to expand upon its foundations and you can’t help but compare it unfavourably when it does not. Between the poor final boss and limited unlockable content, DOA3 isn’t quite able to live up to DOA2, but it’s still a good time in its own right, especially considering the new characters and stage variety on offer. It’s just too bad that we couldn’t get a fully-realized version of the game, because maybe then Dead or Alive 3 could have been the best entry in the franchise.

If you liked this article…

I hate ads. You hate ads. In order to stop polluting my site with obtrusive and annoying ads, I’ve elected to turn them off on IC2S. That said, writing still takes time and effort. If you enjoyed what you read here today and want to give a token of appreciation, I’ve set up a tip jar. Feel free to donate if you feel compelled to and I hope you enjoyed the article! 🙂

Love/Hate: Dead or Alive 2

Welcome back to the Dead or Alive Love/Hate series! In this entry, we’ll be moving onto the next game in the series, Dead or Alive 2. As I said in the previous entry, the original Dead or Alive was fairly derivative: basically a Virtua Fighter wannabe with marketing that played up the pretty girls in its cast in an effort to stand out. Could Dead or Alive 2 step out of this shadow and make its mark on the fighting game scene? Read on to find out…

As before, I played a few different versions of this game to get an idea of the differences between them. Most of my time was spent playing the PS2 Hardcore version, but I also checked out the Dreamcast port and Xbox Ultimate version. The PS2 and Dreamcast versions are very similar, but Ultimate is more akin to a remake using the DOA3 engine than it is a port. It plays fairly similarly overall, but the graphics are improved and updated quite a bit (eg, Ryu Hayabusa’s default costume has been updated to reflect his look in the recently-released Ninja Gaiden), and the localization has basically rewritten every line of dialogue. You can’t really go wrong with any version of DOA2, but for my part, I tend to prefer experiencing the “original” vision of a game. In that regard, PS2’s Hardcore version is the most complete realization of that idea, but if you want the most polished version possible, then Ultimate is your best bet.

Love

  • Core Mechanics – It didn’t take long, but Dead or Alive 2 goes from a rip-off of other fighters to establishing its own identity for the series with one simple addition: throws. With this, a rock-paper-scissors system is introduced, where strikes beat throws, throws beat holds, and holds beat strikes. This, combined with the high/mid/low strikes and hold counter system make playing Dead or Alive a fast-paced, strategic fighter where you can always turn things around with a good prediction, and in order to continue pressing your advantage, you need to mix up your attacks to avoid getting punished. It’s pretty simple to get to grips with and there are tons of combos you can choose to learn if you really want to master a character, but you can still do well just by being aware of the combat triangle.
  • Graphics – It’s been said before, but the graphical leap from the PS1 era to the PS2 era was the biggest in gaming history. The visual difference between DOA1 and DOA2 is a great illustration of this. Character models have gone from blocky stick figures to full-on personalities, and stages have gone from flat squares to detailed, multi-level environments. This is particularly impressive because DOA2 was a launch title for PS2 and the graphics hold up fairly well even today. This is largely down to great art direction: the anime-style character design works well for the hardware and has a timeless quality to it which obscures most of the rough edges and lower-res textures.
    • Of course, if you want the highest-fidelity, Ultimate on Xbox is running on the engine from DOA3 and is by far the best-looking version of DOA2 as a result.
    • I also have to give some credit to attention to detail in this game. I happened to notice that, in one stage, I was standing above an air vent and the hot air exhaust was causing the fabric of the character’s clothes to blow upwards. The game moves fast enough that you could play this game for dozens of hours and never even notice, but it was really cool to see… even if it was probably put in as a way to dynamically upskirt the female characters. See, in any other game I wouldn’t even question the intention of this, but DOA has a reputation and it makes you side-eye things.
    • Oh, and somewhat-related to improved graphics: the boob physics are significantly improved. They still look a little goofy if you actively stare at them (something I would never do, I am only staring in the interest of science), but they’re leaps and bounds better than the original game and far less distracting too.
  • Stage Hazards – Perhaps the flashiest innovation brought by Dead or Alive 2 is its cinematic, interactive stages. No more squares surrounded by bomb traps, Dead or Alive 2‘s stages each have their own personality. Many stages will have obstacles you can knock an opponent into for extra damage (often causing the object they collided with to become damaged and/or explode). The most impressive hazards though are the falls in certain stages: launch an enemy at the right spot and they’ll go flying off a ledge, over a railing, or through a pane of glass. This not only results in a sizeable chunk of bonus damage, but you jump down after them and then fight on an entirely different stage. Some stages have multiple levels, so your fight can end up telling its own little narrative as you move to each new area. This would become a staple of the franchise going forward and it’s still so cool seeing it here.
    • Also worth noting: there are 20 stages available in Hardcore! That’s just an insane amount of stage variety available!
  • New Characters – DOA2 continues to expand the series’ cast with a couple hard-hitters. Most notable is Helena Douglas, who might be the most important character in the franchise. As the daughter and heir of Fame Douglas, the billionaire who established the Dead or Alive tournament, she takes over the company after his assassination and is the one who is involved in organizing all future tournaments. She also has her own motives established here, as her mother was killed in the crossfire when an assassin tried to kill Helena. I also just really like her fighting style: it’s full of grace and precision, which gives her a distinctive personality amongst the cast. Also key to the new additions is Ein, who we eventually come to realize is Kasumi and Ayane’s missing, amnesiac brother, Hayate.
    • Special shout-out to Ayane and Bass Armstrong. They were technically in the PS1 version of Dead or Alive, but they make their full-on debut to the cast here (for the record, we’re going to encounter this situation multiple times in this franchise; I might mention a character appearing in DLC or a re-release, but I consider their debut the point where they’re included in the base game). Ayane is one of the most compelling characters in the franchise. She is a ninja who is a pariah within the Mugen Tenshin clan due to being conceived from the rape of her mother. Despite being close as children, she has developed resentment for her half-sister, Kasumi, due to the unfair way that they are treated and you can sense this in the way that Ayane vengefully hunts her down for abandoning her clan. She has a stand-offish personality and a relentless focus on her mission, but you can tell that these stem from her desire for acceptance. Bass, on the other hand, is a great foil for Tina and provides lots of humour with his hard-ass, doting father act.
    • Unfortunately, this leaves the final new addition, Leon, in the dust… He’s got a compelling enough story, entering Dead or Alive because his lover’s dying words were that she believed that he was the strongest person in the world and he wanted to live up to her image of him. Unfortunately, he basically is just a roster-filler… he is extremely reminiscent of Bayman from the previous game, but with no real plot relevance to speak of.
  • New Game Modes – Dead or Alive 2 brings in some new game modes, my favourites of which are tag battle and team battle. Tag battles are what they sound like: 2v2 matches where you can swap in and out with a button press. There are some strategic options opened up by this mode as well, including passive healing while tagged out and you can perform tag throws for extra damage. It’s great fun and probably my favourite way to play DOA2. Team battle is similar, allowing you to take a team of fighters and then engage in fights up to 5v5. These fights play out one fighter at a time, with the next in line swapping in when the previous is KO’d, but it’s an efficient way to get to try out several fighters in one go.

Hate

  • Story – Look, I don’t have huge expectations for story in a fighting game. Hell, DOA1 has no in-game story presentation, or even endings (in the PS1 version at least), but I didn’t ding the game for that because it wasn’t really what that game was going for. DOA2, on the other hand, is aiming higher, and as a result it has farther to fall if it fails. Unfortunately, the story presented here is nearly incomprehensible. You get thrown into your first fight with zero setup to establish character motivation or what’s even happening. Then you move onto the next fight, rinse and repeat five or six times until the final boss. Now, between some matches, you may get a five second cutscene to establish some character motivation or to highlight that a particular match-up is important. If you play through every character’s story mode, then you might be able to piece together an extremely rough idea of what’s going on, but even that leaves a lot of gaps and misconceptions (particularly when Helena accuses Ayane of being the assassin who killed her mother… we’re given no confirmation if this is true, but there’s also no reason to question this, and it wouldn’t be confirmed to be false until years after the game’s release).
    • The worst part of all this though is the final boss, Tengu. Nothing about this guy makes sense. He’s a demon from Japanese folklore who is causing mischief and screwing around with Ein’s memories. But, considering that he’s the final boss for everyone, he might have something to do with the people running the tournament as well…? Fuck if I know. They’d later retcon that Dead or Alive 3‘s final boss was the one who summoned tengu into our world, but that’s clearly not what they intended at the time this game released, so what the hell was the idea when they made this game…?

I had a blast with Dead or Alive 2. I wasn’t really sure what to expect going in, but I ended up having way more fun with it than I was expecting and walked away thoroughly impressed. As someone who is not particularly adept at fighting games, it scratched that itch I used to get playing Soulcalibur: Broken Destiny for hours on end. It’s on the shorter end of things (entire character story modes can easily be completed in ten minutes), but that just makes the game better for me – it’s easy to just pickup and play, especially now in an era where you can play PS2-era games from the comfort of a handheld emulator. If you have any interest in the franchise, I would heartily recommend checking this game out.

If you liked this article…

I hate ads. You hate ads. In order to stop polluting my site with obtrusive and annoying ads, I’ve elected to turn them off on IC2S. That said, writing still takes time and effort. If you enjoyed what you read here today and want to give a token of appreciation, I’ve set up a tip jar. Feel free to donate if you feel compelled to and I hope you enjoyed the article! 🙂

Love/Hate: Dead or Alive

Dead or Alive has basically become a meme around IC2S. I wouldn’t even count any of these games amongst my top 50 all-time favourites, and I’m not particularly good at fighting games… and yet, there’s something about this series that I always find myself getting drawn to (and no, that “something” isn’t the boobs… well, not exclusively, I swear). Maybe it’s just because I love the movie so much, or maybe it’s because I came into this series through the Ninja Gaiden games, but I have a really soft spot for Dead or Alive. That said, at the time of writing this, I had only really played through the entirety of Dead or Alive 5 and Xtreme 3. I’m immersed enough in this fandom that I found myself with the itch to play through the entire series so I could experience these games in their totality. Of course, that means one thing: we’re starting a new Love/Hate series here on IC2S, beginning with the original Dead or Alive!

Some notes before we go in. Like I said, I’m not particularly great at fighting games. I’ve put a lot of time into multiple fighters over the years, but I’ve always struggled to pull off complex and precise strings of button and directional inputs with any consistency. I wouldn’t say that I’m mindlessly button mashing, but I would get my ass kicked by someone who has taken the time to learn the finer details of their character’s moveset. So, with that in mind, any opinions in this Love/Hate series are from the perspective of a casual fighting game player. Also, there are a butt-load of versions of most of the Dead or Alive games. I’ll disclose which ones I played up-top, because they can make a pretty big difference for a player’s experience. For this original game, I played the PS1 version primarily, but also dabbled with the Xbox Ultimate re-release a bit, and there some pretty substantial differences between them (missing characters, very different graphics engines, stages look different, etc).

So, all that said, how does the original Dead or Alive hold-up today? Read on to find out…

Love

  • The Characters – The cast of Dead or Alive aren’t the most colourful roster in fighting games, but there are some pretty fun personalities, even in this original entry. Ryu Hayabusa is probably the most notable, famous for being the hero of the Ninja Gaiden games on the NES (and would become even more notable when Team Ninja gave him a modernized series of action-adventure games during the Xbox and Xbox 360 era thanks to his popularity in Dead or Alive). Zack is downright overflowing with personality, to the point of being borderline obnoxious (but, hey, that’s Zack for you). Tina Armstrong is pretty interesting: she’s a wrestler with larger than life dreams. She views Dead or Alive as an opportunity to catch the eye of Hollywood producers in addition to being a contest to win. Then there’s Jann Lee and Gen Fu, providing the fighting game-requisite “Bruce Lee guy” and “wise old kung fu master” roles, respectively.
  • Brunette Tina – One of the most striking differences in the original DOA is that Tina Armstrong is a brunette. Apparently she was always intended to be a blonde, but due to some sort of memory issue in this game, they had to make her a brunette… which I don’t understand at all, but that’s why she is a blonde in all DOA follow-ups. However, I’ll die on the hill that Tina Armstrong looks way better as a brunette. In addition to just generally preferring that look, her blonde hairstyle in later entries is a bit too close to Helena Douglas, and I’ve mixed them up on several occasions at a glance.

Mixed

  • Undeveloped Mechanics – Dead or Alive was created as a response to Virtua Fighter, and you can tell that in how the game looks and plays compared to its sequels. This even extends to the signature “provocative” aspects of this franchise: they were just intended to be something to differentiate it from Virtua Fighter. The main differentiating mechanic in this game is the hold/counter system, which allows you to anticipate where your opponents’ attack will be coming from (high/mid/low) and then time a counter-attack to turn the momentum in your favour. While this is fine, it largely turns fights into a game of reflexes and “counter throw whenever the enemy tries to attack you”. It’s especially difficult to go back to this game after playing its sequels, which do much more to develop their own fighting system and have a lot more depth to them. Ultimately, the mechanics of Dead or Alive are fine in a vacuum, but compared to what’s to come, you can feel how undercooked they are.
  • The Boob Physics – Look, I get that titillation is a core part of this series’ identity, but in this entry in particular, the boob physics are just straight-up fucking dumb. Sure, they help this game stand out compared to its competitors, but they’re like goddamn slinkies, flopping around all over the place wildly. This was dumb enough at the time, but after even a few years of technological advance, these physics were just downright ridiculous, which is a problem when you’re trying to make a titillating game with attractive characters. On the other hand, they’re a source of unintentional comedy, so I can’t hate them entirely, but future games would treat boobs with much more… grace.

Hate

  • Difficulty – Look, I definitely don’t mind a reasonable challenge, but DOA is downright unfair. Playing through the campaign on normal difficulty, you have to win two out of three rounds to beat each opponent and then move onto the next. For the first half of the roster, this was a breeze. However, as soon as I got to Bass Armstrong, the difficulty spiked by an insane degree. From what I’ve read, the AI reads your button inputs and then counters them, artificially inflating the difficulty (and I’m pretty sure that their damage rates have been buffed as well). This makes winning two out of three rounds an astronomically difficult task. Just beating Bass Armstrong once took me longer than entire campaign runs in subsequent DOA games. I sincerely doubt I would have had the patience and/or ability to push through to the end if not for save states between rounds. And that’s just for one hard opponent! Ayane and Raidou are just as insane! I am actually not sure how much of this is specific to the PS1 version: Ayane and Bass are both exclusive to the PS1 version of the game, so it might just be this particular version was made to kick your ass extra hard.
  • Boring Stages – Another way you can tell that Dead or Alive is riffing on Virtua Fighter is how the stages look in this game compared to subsequent entries. The stages are basically just flat squares with a perimeter which explodes and causes extra damage to whoever crosses it first. It’s pretty boring, there isn’t much more you can say about it than that.
  • Underage Bullshit – Oh Japan… never change. Kasumi, the face of this franchise, and the character with the most revealing outfit, has been confirmed to be underage during the events of this game (and the next three mainline entries). Team Ninja clearly knew what they were doing too, because her age is unlisted on her bio in a bid to obfuscate this (a trend which carries on with other underage characters in this series for the first few entries). I get that this is a cultural thing, but considering that they clearly knew what they were doing and how that would be perceived, I don’t have any qualms about calling it out. It makes all the marketing playing up how hot the girls in this game are go from “oh 90s game ads!” to outright fucked up. It’s also just fucking dumb? You want your big booby hot girls to lust after, but then make them young, immature, and too innocent… it’s the sort of shit that makes this series come across as creepy. And, for some stupid fucking reason, the first four games in the franchise all take place in the same year, and the only reason I can imagine for that is just so that the audience can keep perving on the underage characters! The underage bullshit established in this game has, by itself, landed this franchise in hot water on multiple occasions when, otherwise, there really isn’t anything objectionable about them. There’s a reason why from Dead or Alive 5-onward, all characters were aged up to at least eighteen and all new characters never go below that age… which is still fucking stupid on its face, but at least it’s not outright problematic at that point. God forbid a character get into their mid-20s, let’s get some age diversity in this franchise, goddammit! (MILF DOA hottie, when?)

The original Dead or Alive is… fine. I didn’t dislike my time with it, but the excessive difficulty, combined with how differently it plays from its successors made me not interested in playing more of it after I beat the campaign mode. There’s certainly some novelty in going back to this game to see how much this series has evolved, but I would say that the series only gets better from here.

If you liked this article…

I hate ads. You hate ads. In order to stop polluting my site with obtrusive and annoying ads, I’ve elected to turn them off on IC2S. That said, writing still takes time and effort. If you enjoyed what you read here today and want to give a token of appreciation, I’ve set up a tip jar. Feel free to donate if you feel compelled to and I hope you enjoyed the article! 🙂

Geek Hierarchy

Back in the mid-2000s, I came across a somewhat-famous flowchart which purported to illustrate the hierarchy by which geeks look down on each other:

Geeks live in a pecking order. Every geek is going to be hit with a level of societal shame for having interests outside what is considered “normal”. The common response to this is to minimize that shame: “Oh sure, I may be a geek, but at least I’m not as bad as (insert geekier kind of person here).” I thought that the chart was pretty accurate when I read it. Sci-fi/fantasy literature were easily the most “acceptable” geeky pursuits, to the point that your parents and grand-parents are doing it. And furries… well, they were the punching bags of all geekdom when this was written. Seems pretty legit for 2002, all things said.

However, I was reminded of this hierarchy chart after a conversation with my son, which led me to tracking it down again. While I think the concept of this chart is fantastic, it really has not aged well. You can feel that this was written in 2002 with snippets like:

  • “Pokemon Fans Over the Age of Six”: If this was written in 2002, then it would have been right at the start of the third generation of Pokemon games. This was the time when most of the original Pokemon-obsessed kids grew out of it, moved on, and Pokemania had finally ended… I can see someone at that time looking at a Pokemon fan their age and thinking “Why are you still interested in that kids thing?!” Now though? Open adoration of this franchise by people of all ages is basically mainstream culture since Pokemon Go released.
  • Roleplayers are placed fairly low in the hierarchy, alongside fanfic writers. This doesn’t feel quite equivalent anymore though, not since DND5e exploded in popularity. Being into roleplaying games is also basically mainstream now.
  • Furries at the bottom of the list is also very much a reflection of the time. Furries as an active subculture were still fairly new, and I imagine that the internet caused people to become more aware of the subculture. As a result, this would have been at the time when people were still reacting viscerally to anything furry-related. Even in 2008, I can recall how annoyed I’d get when a forum poster would have a furry avatar and then would submit art where a fandom’s characters had been turned into furries. Hell, a friend of mine once chatted with the guy who managed the website “God Hates Furries”, which we would frequent often for a laugh. It was the furries who would have the last laugh though (fun fact: the guy who managed God Hates Furries and my friend both ended up becoming furries years later). Eventually, the world just kind of moved on from hating furries, to the point where they’re just accepted now. If you walked into a room of geeks and started talking about how you want to use a flamethrower on all the furries, if it was the year 2002, they would have agreed and died laughing. However, in 2024, most people will look at you and wonder “why you are so weird and out of touch?” and “oh, you’re a homophobe, aren’t you?”
  • It’s also worth noting that this was clearly written in a pre-GamerGate world. As I said in my 2013 review of Noobz, the racist, basement-dwelling geek was progressively seen as an outdated stereotype, up until GamerGate happened and showed the world that there really was an ugly side to geek culture and it was not going away. This has only gotten worse since then, with geek media outrage merchants grifting entire fandoms and making any kind of discourse exhausting.

Suffice to say, I had opinions on the old chart. I wanted to see what an updated version might look like in an era where geek culture has become the culture. How does that affect what is considered “normal” and what is aberrant? And how has backlash to this culture change caused certain geeks to be perceived as worse than others?

Well… here’s my take on it:

The chart pretty much speaks for itself, but I do want to provide some commentary regarding the entries. Please note, ranking in the hierarchy is not intended as a value judgement – I’ll clarify my thoughts on the rankings below, but just keep in mind that this is entirely a measurement of how geeks would classify themselves on the spectrum of geekiness.

The Mainstream

  • Firstly, “Celebrity Geeks”. This ranges from your Henry Cavills, Robin Williamses, and Vin Diesels, to your Wil Wheatons, Felicia Days, or Hideo Kojimas. They may be bigger nerds than you are in some ways, but they ultimately transcend above all due to the sheer power of fame.
  • “Mainstream Geek Media Fans” is pretty much a catch-all for most popular media: film, tv, and books, specifically. This would cover all the famous geek properties that are so ubiquitous that you might not even identify them as geeky at all (such as the MCU, Star Wars, A Song of Ice and Fire, The Lord of the Rings, Pokemon, etc).
  • Next up is “Video Gamers”. Suffice to say, gaming is currently the world’s most popular entertainment medium, to the point of being entirely normal to engage with. In spite of this, gaming still has a bit of a lingering stink which causes it be perceived as inherently more geeky than more traditional media. Not a big deal, but enough to knock it down one spot on the hierarchy.
  • And then we come to our first big branch of the hierarchy. Some of these are pretty obvious: anime and Dungeons & Dragons have become straight-up mainstream in the past decade, which has pushed them way up the hierarchy. “Erotic Cosplayers” probably deserves a clarification though: erotic cosplayers may be geeks in their own right, but there’s definitely a perception that they’re “faking” it in order to be a thirst trap for a geek audience. That’s why erotic cosplayers are actually above regular cosplayers, since they are likely to not even be seen as “real” geeks.

Pretty Geeky

  • All the layers we’ve been through so far are geeky, but entirely mainstream. The next couple layers of the branch is where things start getting identifiably geeky. MMOs, by their complexities and life-eating nature, feel like they deserve to be a couple layers down from video games as a whole. This is also where we start to differentiate between the popularity of geek properties. If you asked a random, middle-age co-worker which Star Wars movie is their favourite, you’ll probably be able to have a full conversation. Now, ask that same co-worker which Doctor is their favourite, and the odds of them even knowing what you’re talking about is going to drop pretty significantly. Comic book readers should also be pretty obvious: the MCU is the biggest media franchise in the world right now, but the majority of viewers do not engage with the comics at all.
  • Next up we have “Fans Who Engage with EU Content”. Going off our previous example, you ask your co-worker what their favourite Star Wars is. They say “The Empire Strikes Back” and then you respond with “the Timothy Zahn Thrawn trilogy” and then suddenly the entire conversation comes to an awkward end as they realize how much of a nerd you are. Star Wars is particularly egregious for this, as there is so much EU content that the fans who engage with it are basically an entirely separate fandom from those who just watch the movies. As a result, I think it’s entirely fair for this kind of geek to get placed lower down on the hierarchy.

Fuckin’ NEEEEEEERD

  • And then we come to “Redditors” and the next branch of associated concepts. Tumblr probably would have also had a place here at one time, but it has been largely usurped over the past several years by Reddit as the popular gathering place online for geeks. Reddit, by its nature, fosters insular communities and specialized interests, which can push a geek to the next level of obsession. The branches coming off of it are directly related: “oh, sure, I may be a Redditor, but at least I am not posting erotic fan art/arguing about who would win in a fight/showing off my Funko Pops/etc”. Oh, and of course, every Redditor thinks that Reddit mods are the biggest geeks there.

Out-and-Proud Stereotypical Geeks

  • Then we get to the low-mid layer, where things get undeniably geeky. “Coders” really speaks for itself – if you’re making your own programs and video games, you’re definitely going to be seen as very geeky, even if it’s in a professional capacity. Bronies, LARPers, ren faire folks and furries are all the biggest geek stereotypes, but that’s the funny thing about how things have changed since 2002 – there’s not only way more acceptance for these groups, but they own their geekiness moreso than anyone else on the hierarchy. So, while furries are still somewhat low on the hierarchy, there’s no longer the scorn you could feel for them in the original chart, which is a nice change. No, that scorn has now gone to…

The Basement-Dwellers

  • Aaaand that takes us out of the “socially acceptable” geeks and the looooong drop down to the bottom rungs of the hierarchy. “The Basement-Dwelling Mountain Dew & Doritos Racist Gamer Stereotype” is what it sounds like – the sort of dickhead who emerged during GamerGate to announce that they actually were proud to be the shit stains that everyone thought that gamers had moved beyond a decade earlier. They’re definitely a lot rarer now adays, but when you come across one, you can’t help but cringe.
  • If you’ve been to any kind of geek convention, then you definitely have cringed at a “Geek Who Openly Display Hentai/NSFW Anime Merch”. Say what you will about how acceptable this is, but you can’t deny that most people are going to see this and think “At least I’m not that much of a geek”.
  • Next up is “Geeks Who Whine About Politics/Fandom Purity”, arguably the most annoying people in modern geek culture. Some of this comes from general culture war brain rot, some of this comes from too much exposure to outrage grifters, and some of this comes from geniune concerns about changes to the fandom over time. Whatever the source, they manifest this concern by being insufferable and toxic, polluting fandom discourse and making engaging in the community exhausting. As a result, any fandoms where these kinds of geeks are accepted ends up pushing the less-geeky folks out, leading to an endless spiral where those communities become more and more geeky and more and more toxic at the same time.
  • The next level is, of course, 4chan, notorious for all manner of geeky degeneracy (and home to many of the aforementioned “unacceptable” geeks). This is largely down to how much 4channers have embraced their worst stereotypes as NEETs and degenerates. 4channers may not be so bad individually, but 4chan itself acts as a rallying point for less-extreme geeks: “Hey, I may be a basement-dwelling Mountain Dew and Doritos racist gamer, but at least I’m not a 4channer”.
  • Finally, we have the punching bags of the internet, the incels. These feel like the most obvious omission from the original chart to me, to the point where “incel” has become a mainstream insult. Do incels deserve this scorn? Certainly not all of them, but considering the hateful environments incel forums become and the prevalence of incel mass shooters and the subsequent praise of these shooters within incel communities, it’s no wonder that these kinds of geeks get absolutely shit upon.

And that’s my modern take on the hierarchy. You could definitely argue that there’s room for refinement and I’m sure I’ve missed some pretty big types of nerds, but I’m fairly happy with the result. Not bad, considering that I put this chart together and wrote most of this article while high on edibles.

If you liked this article…

I hate ads. You hate ads. In order to stop polluting my site with obtrusive and annoying ads, I’ve elected to turn them off on IC2S. That said, writing still takes time and effort. If you enjoyed what you read here today and want to give a token of appreciation, I’ve set up a tip jar. Feel free to donate if you feel compelled to and I hope you enjoyed the article! 🙂

Ads Suck

I’ve been with Google Adsense for about 15 years. I started with Youtube, where I had one of my paintball videos get over 14,000 views, and a few others got over 1,000. Then I started IC2S on Blogger and, at one point, my Ang Lee Hulk review somehow ended up as one of the top Google image results for the movie. Sure, I’ve always been a very small fish in a big sea and I am well aware of that. However, I just want to mention this because, in this entire time, my grand total payout from Google Adsense has been…

$101.50.

Right now, there’s $44 in my Adsense account. It has been there all year. Oh, sure, Google tells me that I’ll make a couple dollars per month, but it never actually increases my balance, and I’ve even seen it drop over time for inscrutable reasons.

Meanwhile, in an attempt to see if I could monetize IC2S in order to cover some of the costs of running the site, I’ve had to grit my teeth as Google plastered the entire site with ads, making it fucking ugly and pretty much unreadable. I’m certain that this has negatively affected site traffic, because who the fuck would want to read a site where every paragraph is broken up with huge ads? And all this, in a desperate hope that maybe Google will grant me a $100 pittance sometime this decade?

Nah, fuck that.

As of today, I’ve shut off Adsense for IC2S. Now you can actually enjoy my writing and see it the way it was meant to be seen. I hope that this allows more people to come to enjoy IC2S. I still fondly remember how formative blogs like Head Injury Theater, 11points, and others were for me growing up, and I hope that I can provide that kind of reach for other generations.

All that said… IC2S is a lot of work. I don’t post nearly as often as I used to, just due to the time commitment being untenable with fatherly duties, other hobbies, my mercurial writing burnout, etc. When I do write, it tends to be Retrospective or a Love/Hate series, which can monopolize a month or more of my time, easily, each time I set about writing them. On top of this, it costs me about $90/year to keep the site operating. I can afford this, at least for now, but it sure as hell would be nice to get an acknowledgement that I’m not just pissing my money away and screaming into the void endlessly.

All this to say: I’ve set up a tip jar. If you enjoyed something you read on IC2S and want to show some thanks, the option is there to provide a bit of monetary compensation. This is entirely optional. I’m not holding the site ransom, stopping my writing, or shutting the site down anytime soon (there are too many Resident Evil properties left to do that). I’ll add a little reminder about the tip jar at the end of each post, but that’s a hell of a lot better than getting face-blasted with ads every ten seconds with the old setup.

Anyway, that’s it for this little announcement. I’ve been on a short break from the Resident Evil Love/Hate series, but I’m starting to get the itch to dive back in, so hopefully we can get the final batch of games done and posted in the next few months. Until then, I hope to see you back here soon.

Love/Hate: Resident Evil 1.5 (BONUS)

Welcome back to a very special bonus entry in the Resident Evil love/hate series! In this entry we’ll be going over the original version of Resident Evil 2, dubbed by fans as Resident Evil 1.5. A very rough build of this unfinished game leaked years ago and a group of dedicated fans have stitched it together into a mostly-playable demo. I thought that it could be fascinating to see how this early prototype plays, considering that much of the work put into it was scrapped and didn’t make its way into the game we ended up getting. How does it hold up and differ compared to the Resident Evil 2 that would ultimately see release? Read on to find out…

Love

  • It Exists – Look, the most remarkable thing about Resident Evil 1.5 is the fact that it exists at all, that we have access to it, and that it’s playable. In the world of video game development and releases, this is a straight-up miracle. We rarely get to see in-development game builds, let alone actually play them for ourselves. This stands doubly-true when a game gets scrapped mid-development, with all the ideas and concepts that had been in production at the time never seeing the light of day. RE1.5 stands as a relic of a game that never was and shows a snapshot of the ideas which eventually evolved into the Resident Evil 2 we know, which is just fascinating to experience first-hand.
  • Elza Walker – Leon is largely the same in RE1.5 as he is in RE2, but what’s really interesting is the character who didn’t make it to the full release: Elza Walker. Considering that she is basically an unrefined version of Claire Redfield with very little writing and no voice acting to flesh her out, it’s kind of remarkable how much Elza Walker stands out as her own distinct character in RE1.5. Her racing outfit is instantly iconic, distinctive, and striking. In addition, her skills as a race car driver give the character an interesting and unique hook compared to this series’ stable of cops and soldiers. I’m endlessly fascinated by the fact that this game allows us to play as this character who never got to see the light of day. Sure, we didn’t get to learn much about her in this scrapped build of the game, but there’s enough character here that Elza could legitimately make her way into a future Resident Evil game and be accepted with enthusiasm (in fact, Capcom are definitely aware of this as well since they gave Claire an Elza Walker costume in REmake 2).
  • Zombie Variety – One of the coolest aspects of RE1.5 compared to RE2 is that you’re not just shooting the exact same zombie type over and over again. There are a lot more different varieties of zombies, including female ones, fat ones, etc. This doesn’t have a massive impact on gameplay or anything, but it does make this feel more like a massive outbreak with casualties all across the populace.

Mixed

  • Damage Status – RE1.5 has its own unique way to show damage on your character. As your character takes damage, they will begin to have cuts and show tears on their clothing. It’s definitely an improvement on RE1, but it’s also really easy to miss in the heat of combat. RE2‘s ultimate decision to use a limping animation was far better at conveying information and making you want to heal ASAP.

Hate

  • Technically Rough – Look, I get it. Resident Evil 1.5 was unfinished and has basically been cobbled together to even get into a playable state. If you play it, you’re accepting that you’re not playing a completed video game, or even one that was meant to be played at all. Even with all that in mind, you can’t help but acknowledge that actually playing RE1.5 ranges from awkward, to rough, to straight-up broken. Characters are not properly integrated with the pre-rendered backgrounds, so they will regularly walk “over” scenery that should be in the foreground, the map is completely broken and useless, none of the type writers or item boxes work, picking up items and reading files can cause the game to crash, animations are incomplete… again, this is to be expected when you’re playing a game like this, but it still makes for a rough experience at best.
  • You Can Kinda See Why It Got Scrapped – While there is clearly more work that needs to be done to make this game functional, you really can start to understand the developers’ concerns that the game just wasn’t coming together. This version of the RPD has no personality compared to the released version – it’s just a big, square, stereotypical police department building with three main floors and then two basement floors. It doesn’t have the sprawling exploration of other Resident Evil games, you just travel between floors, clearing them out one at a time. The majority of the obstacles are either masses of very stupid and easy to dodge zombies, or shutters, which are closed all over the damn station.
  • Combat Feels Bad – I’m not sure why it’s like this in RE1.5, but the shooting feels massively nerfed compared to even the first Resident Evil. Maybe it’s just because Elza is not skilled with guns, but every shot I took was painfully slow and it takes a lot of rounds to actually down a zombie. As a result, you rarely have enough space to just stand your ground and kill a zombie before it reaches you, let alone if you have multiple zombies approaching. Sometimes you don’t even have enough room to back up either, so just running tends to be the best approach.
  • Not Entirely Original Content? – This I am not entirely sure of, but there were a couple things I came across which seem like they have been added by modders, which makes me question what exactly is in RE1.5 which has been added in after the fact. The two big things were that I encountered the Brad Vickers poster from REmake 2, and in the basement there is what appears to be a statue of Pochita from Chainsaw Man (for some reason). I get that this is just some modder putting a piece of themselves into RE1.5, but it undermines this game’s status as a snapshot of a game that never was, because now I just can’t know how much of it is original and what isn’t.
  • There’s Not Much to Do – Again, I get it, the game is not finished… but that also means that playing this game as-is doesn’t give you a whole lot to do. It’s the equivalent of a digital museum: lots of interesting things to see, but not a whole lot to actually do while you’re in it.

Resident Evil 1.5 is a fascinating peek into the processes which bring us the games that we love. While it isn’t particularly compelling as a game in its own right, viewing it that way is kind of missing the point. If you’re a big fan of the early Resident Evil games, I definitely recommend tracking this down so you can get a look into the early development decisions which helped shape the RE2 we know today.

Love/Hate: Resident Evil 3 – Nemesis

Welcome back to the Resident Evil love/hate series! In this entry we’ll be going over the original Resident Evil 3: Nemesis! I’ve got quite a history with this game in particular – I can remember seeing Nemesis on the box art for the game and hearing that he would actively stalk you around the game, and I thought that sounded like the coolest shit ever. It was the first Resident Evil title that I can remember being interested in and I would eventually purchase it, RE1 and RE2 for the PS1 Classics store on my good ol’ PSP. However, it’s also the only one of those games that I actually put any time into (again, I really dug the premise, so I really wanted to try it out). I ended up getting about 1/3 of the way in during that attempt, despite not getting on well with the tank controls and general gameplay at the time (that said, I had vivid memories of reaching the train car and a couple of the puzzles and locales, so I know I managed to make it a couple hours in).

Well, in the years since I have played through a lot of Resident Evil games, including this game’s remake and all the other “classic” entries in the franchise, and I’ve been very excited to finally dive back in and complete the game that first piqued my interest in this series in full. Would it manage to live up to the lofty expectations I had placed on it? Read on to find out…

Love

  • Raccoon City – I had already praised Resident Evil 2 for expanding the game’s scope compared to RE1, but RE3 cranks things up to the point of making RE2 look tiny in comparison. Most of this game takes place within the streets of Raccoon City itself as Jill Valentine has to scrounge up the supplies needed to make her escape. For a PS1 game, it is impressive just how sprawling the city is, as you traverse throughout the streets and into various locales (including the RPD itself). The environmental design has also improved once again, really bringing Raccoon City to life, showing the scale of the devastation it has been subjected to, and showing glimpses of the lives that once were lived here.
  • The Outbreak – On a somewhat-related note, RE3 really hammers home the reality of Raccoon City’s zombie apocalypse in a way that RE2 conspicuously ignores (all versions of RE2, for that matter). The game’s opening cinematic really hammers home how brutal and terrifying this situation is for those caught up in it. The streets are absolutely overrun with undead and we find that there really isn’t anywhere left in the city that’s safe for survivors. Moreso than any other Resident Evil game (other than Outbreak, fittingly), RE3 nails the idea of being caught up in a zombie apocalypse and allows you to live out that scenario.
  • The Story – RE3‘s story is, by and large, the same as REmake 3‘s (which I have praised as probably the strongest story in the franchise). While it is less flashy and refined, it is still solid and enjoyable. Like its remake, RE3‘s story largely stands out in the ways that it differs from your typical Resident Evil game. The overall plot is incredibly simple: escape the city. However, there is a strong focus on character, particularly in the development of Jill and Carlos. Jill does not trust Carlos due to his affiliation with Umbrella, and Carlos believes that Umbrella has the city’s best interests in mind when he’s deployed to try to rescue civilians. However, over the course of the game, Jill learns that there are well-meaning people working within Umbrella, and finds herself coming to trust Carlos. Carlos, on the other hand, gains a deep appreciation for Jill’s strength, comes to realize his complicity in Umbrella’s crimes, and questions his loyalty to the company’s orders. Furthermore, the game greatly benefits from its nigh-unkillable and persistent antagonist, who keeps the pressure on throughout the entire game in a way that no other Resident Evil antagonist can really compare. Furthermore, the game also keeps its focus on the bigger picture – the fate of Raccoon City as a whole is kept in focus as we see the city destroyed at the end. It would have been easy for the game to end like RE2, content that our heroes have escaped, but they made sure to show the ultimate devastation wrought by Umbrella.
  • Nemesis – The titular big-bad is, without a doubt, the most intimidating and imposing enemy in the franchise. The story sets him up this way, and the gameplay does not disappoint. He’s incredibly difficult to fight, running at you in a terrifying sprint, firing a rocket launcher, or making you shit your pants when you try to run to another area and then he follows you and donkey punches you in the back of the head. He can put you into a real panic, but he rarely outstays his welcome, and there are only three mandatory confrontations in the whole game, so if you need to run you have the freedom to do so. However, if you want to stand and fight, that’s also an option, and the game will reward you for it with some fantastic weapons and items.
    • For my part, I elected to stand and fight in most cases, including the incredibly difficult first and second fights where you simply do not have the weapons and ammo required to make this fight short. I died to Nemesis more in these two fights than I did in my entire playthroughs of RE1, 2, and Code: Veronica. I had to put on my Dark Souls pants and git gud, which helped make the rest of my encounters a little bit more manageable. Simply put, try to get him close, then run past his right arm so he’ll be baited for a grab. Then get a few meters away from him and unload a shotgun blast or two pistol shots. Rinse and repeat a dozen times and he’ll go down. Sounds simple enough, but he will sometimes charge at you and leave you with little time to react/dodge. Still, using a couple heals is preferable to dying over and over again.
  • Live Selection – RE3 improves on RE2‘s zapping system with (in my opinion) its far more impactful “live selection” mechanic. At certain points in the game, you’ll be given the option to take one of two different courses of action. While these choices won’t drastically alter the story or let you explore entirely new areas (often you’ll just start in one of two rooms, which you will be able to find pretty quickly), the choices they often the player can often be pretty huge. There are several Nemesis encounters that you can avoid entirely, or cheese to get free item drops from using this system. In addition, I found that the game really encourages taking the “bold” course of action, so it’s nice that it’s not punishing you with a cheap death because you didn’t know enough to make the “right” choice. Ultimately, I love how this lets the player tailor the experience to their wants and needs in any given situation, and it encourages replays to see how much you can affect the game.
  • Improved Map – Once again, the map in RE3 has been improved substantially from its predecessor. In addition to all the previous improvements, viewing the map now has its own dedicated button (L2), you can zoom in and out, all save rooms are marked on the map, and areas of interest are highlighted in blue. It’s not quite at the level of REmake 2‘s user-friendly map, but considering that this is only three years after RE1‘s bare-bones effort, this is a quantum-leap forward.
  • Gun Powders – RE3 introduces the concept of gun powders that you can use and mix in order to make ammunition for your various weapons. Like the live selection mechanic, I love how this allows player choice and expression to take center stage. If you want, you can produce ammo for your mainstay handgun and shotgun, eventually learning how to make stronger ammo if you keep doing so. However, you can also choose to mix ammo types together to produce various types of grenade launcher shells or even magnum rounds in order to fight Nemesis more efficiently. It all depends on your ammo situation at the time and your preferences and priorities, which is fantastic as far as I’m concerned.
  • Graphics – Perhaps unsurprisingly, considering that it was the last PS1 Resident Evil game, but RE3 is easily the best-looking entry on the system. In addition to everything I said about how Raccoon City is brought to life, the character models are all a noticeable step up from the previous games.
  • Stairs! – This is a pretty small change in the grand scheme of things, but OH MY GOD, you can just walk up and down stairs now without having to press a button first! Not only does this make for much smoother gameplay, but it also means that you can stop and turn around if you wish (say, if you’re heading down some stairs and then see that Nemesis is waiting for you at the bottom).

Mixed

  • Dodge – RE3‘s dodge is somewhat notorious for how unreliable it is. In my experience, it’s not that it is bad or unresponsive (unlike, say, Resident Evil: Revelations). When I wanted to dodge, I found the timing was pretty reasonable and, against certain enemies, I was dodging like a champ. However, the main issue is that the dodge is mapped to R1 (aka, the aim button), or if you’re already aiming, then it’s R1+X (aka, the button you’d press to shoot). The biggest issue this creates is that, unless you’re actively, intentionally practicing your dodges, most of the dodges you are going to do are going to be completely by accident. Furthermore, you have no invincibility during a dodge. As a result, you can successfully pull one off, and then still get caught in a grab attack, or attacked by a different enemy altogether. It’s kind of bullshit, but luckily the game doesn’t require you to be able to dodge in order to be successful (looking at you again, Revelations…). As a result, it feels more like a bonus when it happens that can get you out of trouble on occasion, or a high-skill mechanic to master, but it would have been really nice if the game let you map dodge to its own dedicated button.
    • This is where I should note that there are apparently custom patches for this game where you can map dodge to the R2 button. I didn’t find out about this until I was just about the finish the game, but if I had known sooner, I probably would have given it a try.
  • Randomized Puzzles – I think that RE3 was the one classic Resident Evil game where I didn’t need to look up the solutions to any of its puzzles. They tend to be pretty intuitive, or straight-up tell you what you need to do, or can be brute-forced without too much trouble… which is good, because you can’t really look up the answers the way you could in the other games, because the puzzles and their solutions have been randomized. I get that this is done to make subsequent playthroughs feel more “fresh” and for the puzzles to not feel like a boring obstacle when you have already completed them once, but if you were to get stuck on one, it could be a uniquely frustrating experience in RE3.

Hate

  • The Controls – While I don’t really like tank controls, I’ve gotten used to them over the course of the last few games because they were necessary to make the games function within their technical limitations, and the games were designed with them in mind. However, RE3 reaches a tipping point where its controls are actively starting to feel inadequate for the situations the game is putting you in. First of all, a lot of the difficulty with Nemesis comes down to his incredible speed, coupled with your inability to maneuver with any speed in response. If you had more “modern” and “free” movement controls, Nemesis would be significantly easier to deal with as you could bait his grabs more consistently, and you could actually respond to his charges. It’s not just Nemesis either, as even the basic zombies are now significantly faster and will close the distance with you in a fraction of the time required of other Resident Evil games. It feels like these changes were made because of the addition of the dodge and quick turn. However, the dodge is unreliable as we have said, and the quick turn is still too slow to actually be useful when fighting Nemesis, so the game just ends up feeling like it has gotten faster than your movement can really keep up with. Oh, also, when Nemesis throws you to the ground and you have to button mash like mad to stand up? Fuck that shit, it sucks.
  • Reload Tool – As much as I love the gun powder system in this game, it all revolves around the reload tool, which some genius at Capcom decided should take up an inventory slot instead of being Jill’s default item… y’know, the sort of thing every other character in a Resident Evil game had had up until this point. Hell, Jill never even has a default item in this game, so would it have killed them to give her this? As a result, I’m putting my reload tool in the box most of the time, because most of the gun powder you find will be near a save room anyway.
  • Difficulty Modes – RE3 has two difficulty modes: easy and hard. No “normal” mode…? The differences between these modes is pretty substantial too. Easy is laughably easy, playing more like an action movie power fantasy, as Jill starts with a veritable arsenal of overpowered guns that she can use to just blast her way through the entire game. Meanwhile, hard mode is straight-up the hardest Resident Evil survival horror experience I’ve ever had. I breezed through the first two games, Code: Veronica, REmake, even 0… this was significantly harder than all of those games*. To be entirely fair, this is at least partially on me for deciding to try to fight Nemesis when I was not well-equipped to do so. It’s not just Nemesis though, the streets are absolutely swarming with zombies, you will barely have enough ammo to deal with them, and if you do shoot everything you see then you will be hard-up when Nemesis shows up. Around the mid-point when you get more ammunition and can actually deal with Nemesis in a (somewhat) fair fight, the game becomes easier, but it would have been nice if there was a bit more granularity between “ridiculously easy” and “tough as nails”.
  • The Mine Thrower – Man, fuck this gun. It fires mine projectiles, which stick to surfaces and enemies and then detonate after a couple seconds (or, if you miss, when an enemy is in proximity). However, there are so many drawbacks to using it. First of all, if you’re in close proximity to the mine when it detonates, you’ll get hit. Guess which blazing-fast enemy you’re going to be using this against the most, who will close the distance to you after being stuck twice, therefore damaging you twice with your own weapon? Oh, and lest you think you can manually reload the mine thrower to avoid getting caught with no shots in the barrel, for some god-forsaken reason you straight-up cannot manually reload it until its empty. That’s not even the end of it though – if you’ve emptied the gun and try to manually reload it before all the shots have detonated, it will cause all unexploded mines to fizzle. What. The. Fuck. Seriously, this gun fucking sucks, just stick with the grenade launcher.
  • The Discourse – This isn’t something I hold against RE3 itself, but I do feel like it needs to be said. As a self-processed lover of REmake 3, I’m absolutely sick of the discourse surrounding RE3 vs REmake 3 within the Resident Evil fandom. If you went into REmake 3 expecting a faithful remake of the original, then I can understand your disappointment. However, then saying that REmake 3 sucks and is one of the worst Resident Evil games of all-time is absolutely insane to me. REmake 3 is a great game and has different strengths compared to the original – the story and characters are better, the controls make the challenge a lot fairer, the presentation is much slicker and modern, the hospital section is a big improvement on the original, and it’s more of an action-spectacle thrill-ride. Meanwhile, the original has that PS1 charm, classic gameplay style, it’s got a lot more exploration, more freedom in its gameplay and story, and has areas which don’t make it into the remake. Both games can stand out in their own ways. Honestly, as we’ve seen with RE1 vs REmake, that’s probably a better fate for a game than getting completely upstaged. Also, I’m old enough to remember when RE3 was considered the black sheep of the franchise – a disappointment compared to the blockbuster RE2, lacking the groundbreaking history of RE1, less-exciting than Code: Veronica, and then forgotten after the release of RE4. It wasn’t until years later that people started looking at this game the way I do, and I feel like history has kind of repeated itself with REmake 3. All I can hope is that it someday gets the reappraisal I think it deserves.

Resident Evil 3: Nemesis is another true classic in the franchise’s early entries, but what really makes it stand out for me is just how unique it is. No other game in this franchise plays quite the way this one does, with its large-scale scope, full-on apocalypse setting, focus on character development, a persistent and incredibly difficult antagonist, and all the gameplay additions like the dodge, live selection, reload tool, etc. Given that no other game in this franchise has improved or iterated on these concepts, it means that Resident Evil 3: Nemesis still stands out all these years later as an entry worth experiencing.

*Note: Code: Veronica and 0 are notoriously difficult games, but their difficulty is largely down to bullshittery. Code: Veronica will fuck you over if you don’t already know about all its progression-halting roadblocks and respawning enemies who simply waste your resources. 0 is somewhat similar, screwing you over when an out of nowhere boss fight takes away one of your characters, or becoming damn near impossible if you just so happen to not have any flame-based ammunition on you when you come across a leechman. However, the moment-to-moment gameplay of these games is not that bad (although I would say that 0 is easily the second-hardest classic Resident Evil). Contrast this with RE3, whose difficulty comes down to it’s mechanics being more demanding than other Resident Evil games, where even the basic enemies are more dangerous and numerous than in any other classic entry and your movement isn’t really sufficient to keep up with it.

Love/Hate: Resident Evil 2

Welcome back to the Resident Evil love/hate series! In this entry we’ll be going over the original Resident Evil 2! Often considered the best of the “classic” era of Resident Evil, its popularity has been overshadowed several times over the years – first by Resident Evil 4, then by the cult reappraisal of REmake, then by the remake of Resident Evil 2 released twenty one years later. Given that REmake 2 was the game that started this whole Love/Hate rundown of the Resident Evil series, I’ve been excited to check the original and see how it compares. Does it still hold up or, like its predecessor, is it doomed to be eternally overshadowed by its remake? Read on to find out…

Love

  • Scale and Scope – The original Resident Evil was a rather claustrophobic, isolated, and intimate affair, taking place within a single mansion grounds in the deep woods. Resident Evil 2, on the other hand, takes the James Cameron approach to sequels – bigger and better. This game takes place in a full-on zombie outbreak in a crowded city. It feels far more like a Romero-style zombie apocalypse, complete with an opening escape sequence with more zombies attacking you than there might have been in the entirety of the first game. You also encounter survivors who actually get to do more than just die the moment you meet them, making this feel like a massive event that everyone’s struggling to survive through.
  • Everything is Improved – Rather than making a ton of repetitive bullet points for all this stuff, I really need to emphasize just how much everything has been improved in Resident Evil 2:
    • First of all, the presentation. The environments in this game are SO much more detailed than they were in the original Resident Evil. The Spencer Mansion’s environments were sparse to an extreme, whereas every frame of Resident Evil 2 is packed with details, whether these be for mood-setting, environmental storytelling, or to draw you towards objectives and items.
    • Secondly, the voice acting and writing have improved immensely. While not exactly up to modern standards, it’s passable even now, and a damn sight better than most of its contemporaries.
    • On a related note, this game’s CG cutscenes are solid and far more impactful than the laughable live-action FMVs from the original game.
    • They also didn’t waste much time improving a lot of the annoyances I had with the original Resident Evil. The new in-game map is significantly improved, actually showing you what doors are locked, colour-coding them by the key needed to open them, and allowing you to check maps of areas other than the one you’re currently in. Everything just feels like it’s faster too – stair-traversal, text scrolling, discarding useless key items, etc. I would have expected such improvements to occur over the course of a few games, but Resident Evil 2 has already improved to the point where even it makes the original game feel archaic.
  • Refined Design – I was very annoyed with how unfair the original Resident Evil could feel to a new player, especially in the early game when health and ammo are in short supply, zombies are everywhere, and there isn’t much room to maneuver around them. Resident Evil 2‘s environments have been designed in such a way where dodging zombies and Lickers is far more consistently doable, making it a far more reliable strategy to fall back on. Tying into this, this game also gives you way more HP than the original did – at one point, I took three zombie bites (which would have killed me in the original Resident Evil) without dropping out of green health. In addition, button mashing to escape a zombie grab actually works in this game and there’s actual animation and visual feedback to show that it’s working. Similarly, the game also has visual indicators to show how low your health is, so no more just dying out of nowhere – if you’re in danger, you are going to know it and try to heal ASAP.
  • RPD – Okay, I said that the Spencer Mansion was arguably the best environment in the Resident Evil franchise, but that was kind of a mistruth… because I would be the one to argue that RPD is straight-up better. It’s smaller, and we don’t spend quite as much time here, but it has a similar design where two floors are split up on each side of a central hub area. However, the biggest leg-up that RPD has is that several shortcuts are opened up as you explore the area, cutting down considerably on the amount of backtracking required to reach any given area.
  • The Story – You should know by now that I’m always ragging on how disappointing Resident Evil stories are, and I knocked REmake 2 for this very thing… but, man, I was surprised by how much more effective the story of this game is told in the original Resident Evil 2. In REmake 2, the game’s actual plot is “escape the city”, with Leon and Claire just happening to bump up against a more interesting story that’s going on every once in a while that they have no real reason to be involved in. However, everything makes a lot more sense in Resident Evil 2. First of all, it takes actual effort to tie this game’s story into the events of the first Resident Evil. Additionally, the game slowly draws Leon and Claire into the G-virus research and Umbrella politicking going on, and the way it played out made more sense to me for these characters to be getting involved in the unfolding mess. Furthermore, the A and B scenarios are integrated into the story far more organically and make way more sense as overlapping events compared to REmake 2.
  • Lickers – Lickers are easily the coolest non-boss B.O.W.s in all of Resident Evil, so I have to give major props to Resident Evil 2 for introducing them. They’re not even all that difficult to deal with here (either by avoiding them, or by blasting them with a single acid grenade round or 2-3 shotgun shells), but they are such iconic, disgusting monsters and can potentially be such a big threat that you can’t help but be intimidated any time you encounter them.
  • Impressive Gore – The original Resident Evil had some pretty gnarly PS1 gore (even if the best stuff was censored in nearly every release of the game), but Resident Evil 2 kicks it up a notch. In addition to everything that was in the previous game, you can kick downed zombies’ heads off, explosive grenades blow individual limbs off of zombies, Chief Irons gets nearly torn in half from the inside out by a G parasite, and the bowgun violently impales zombies with multiple arrows (which puts the piddly arrows from Code: Veronica to shame). Probably most impressive though is the shotgun: not only can it explode heads (like in the original), but if you blast a zombie with it, it can blow off entire chunks of their body, or blow them in half, causing the lower half to dawdle about for a moment, while the top half falls to the floor and then starts crawling after you. My jaw was on the floor when this happened to me the first time, it’s seriously impressive and unexpected in a game this old.

Mixed

  • Hidden Items – This game’s more detailed environments are definitely a huge step up from the original Resident Evil, but the one big issue I have with them is that they make it a lot harder to determine where items are. The original game’s items were all pretty obvious – they were on the one table/desk/shelf in the room, or the one object in the room that was a 3D model, and were usually modelled in the game. In this game though, many of the non-key items are not physically present in the game, so you’re expected to just inspect everything to you come across to make sure you’re not missing any items. This does seem to be at least partially intentional in order to get you to investigate your surroundings, but it can also be finicky about your inputs and exact placement. I also nearly missed the grenade launcher in Claire’s playthrough, which would have made completing the game orders of magnitude more difficult.
  • Zapping System & Alternate Scenarios – I’ll fully admit, me putting this in “mixed” largely comes down to how hyped this system was for me before playing it. All through the reviews of REmake 2, old-school fans would complain that they nerfed the A and B scenario differences, that it was so much better in the original in comparison, so I was expecting some pretty big changes and for the overlapping stories to make more sense… and then my game starts and I immediately am rupturing the same water tower that Claire did to put out a fire that Claire put out, opening the same safe and locked doors, opening up the same shortcuts, etc. Maybe it’s a bit unrealistic of me to expect this to have been changed more, but it was somewhat disappointing and the unmatched hype left me deflated. That said, I will admit that the A and B scenarios are more fleshed out in the original than the remake in a couple ways:
    • First of all, in REmake 2, an A and B scenario will establish where and how the characters start at RPD, but each character’s plot will play out the same otherwise. In this game, each characters’ A and B scenarios can have some pretty big effects on how the story plays out, which bosses you fight, and what areas you end up visiting.
    • While there is a lot of gameplay overlap in the A and B scenarios in this game, it will heavily remix the order in which events play out in each area (eg, in Claire A you start out exploring the first floor wings of the RPD, whereas in Leon B you’re running around all over the second floor and east wing for the first stretch of the game).
    • In addition, this game has it’s aforementioned “zapping” system, where actions you take in the A scenario will have an effect on how the B scenario plays out. These decisions, admittedly, will barely affect how your B scenario actually plays out, but they’re a cool idea.
    • What this all comes out to is that this game incentivizes at least four playthroughs to see everything its main story has to offer, and makes each of those playthroughs feel fresher in the way it has done this. REmake 2, by contrast, crams most of the content from these four playthroughs into two playthroughs, although the second playthrough is a lot less “unique”. Your mileage will vary on which approach is better and, honestly, I don’t really know myself which option I prefer. I like to move on to new games after beating one, so I’m not going to experience a Leon A/Claire B run anytime soon. I guess it can be said that, when I do get to it someday, that experience will be more interesting, but there’s also something to be said about just getting the experience I wanted the first time around instead of having to do it all over again two more times just because.

Hate

  • No Auto Lock-On (By Default) – I was not too happy when I started Resident Evil 2, saw how many more zombies there were coming at you from all directions this time, and then realized that the game was forcing me to slowly, manually point my character at any zombie I wanted to shoot instead of automatically snapping to them like in every other Resident Evil game I’ve played to this point. However, I did soon discover that there is auto lock-on available, but that it’s found in the controls menu and has to be toggled to. This is baffling to me, why would this not be the default option? You know that there are probably a large portion of this game’s audience who didn’t discover this and ended up playing through the whole thing without it.
  • Sherry Babysitting – While playing as Claire, Sherry will follow you around during a few sections of the game. She’s helpless, so the game will make her stay at a little bit of a distance to avoid getting damaged… buuuut, she will also stop moving if you get too far away from her. What this means is that, on multiple occasions, you’re going to reach an exit, only for the game to say “I can’t leave without Sherry!” because she decided to crouch down an hide somewhere back along the route you took. It’s a minor inconvenience at the end of the day, but it is annoying regardless… and, honestly, nitpicking is about the worst that I can say, that tells you all you need to know about how good this game is.

Resident Evil 2 is fantastic. It’s a massive improvement on its predecessor and it’s easy to see why it was considered the gold-standard of the franchise for so long. It’s basically flawless for its time and I daresay that I enjoy it a bit more than its remake (although REmake 2 is certainly better in its own ways, but I’d have to give the original the slight edge overall). I wasn’t really expecting that going into this game, but it made for a pleasant surprise!

Love/Hate: Resident Evil

Welcome back to the Resident Evil love/hate series! Now that we’ve been through all the main entries in the franchise, it’s only appropriate to go back to the beginning with the original PS1 trilogy. Naturally, that means we’re going to start with the original Resident Evil! How does this game hold up 28 years later? Read on to find out…

Note: Since I played REmake was Jill, I decided to play as Chris for this run. I know that this makes the game a fair bit harder, but given that this is essentially a second playthrough for me, I figured I was up for the challenge. This may or may not colour some of my opinions on the game, so fair warning.

Love

  • Cheesiness – Early Resident Evil games are known for their bad voice acting and writing, and they don’t get any cheesier than the original game (other than maybe Survivor). The live-action FMVs, the bad localization, and the pathetic voice acting are hilarious and give this game a unique charm that we simply do not get in games anymore. There are just so many unintentionally funny and awkward lines in this game. I already knew about Barry’s heavily-memed lines, but experiencing Chris’s campaign first-hand introduced me to some funny lines I’d never heard before. By far the funniest moment is when Wesker is trying to show off Tyrant, and Chris just laughs at him and calls them both failures. It completely clowns on Wesker as a character, which really undermines what he becomes later in the series (complete with Chris saying that he’s “sleeping with the ultimate failure”), but goddamn is it not funny to see here in the first outing.
    • I’ll also say this – the janky voice acting and writing actually manages to mask some of the more ridiculous aspects of the story compared to REmake. For a particularly egregious example, Enrico’s death is kind of an idiotic plot point. He calls Chris a traitor, points his gun at him, and then someone off-screen shoots him. Instead of, y’know, trying to figure out who shot Enrico or why they might have done this, Chris just goes “huh, I wonder what happened?” in both this game and REmake. That doesn’t make a lot of sense with REmake‘s much flashier and serious presentation, but here it’s just par for the course.
  • Spencer Mansion – I’ve played a lot of Resident Evil games and I can confidently say that the Spencer Mansion is still arguably the best-designed layout in the whole series. Having a central hub area that you figure-eight through throughout most of your journey works fantastically and it’s kind of surprising that no game since has been able to match this kind of design. It also helps that item boxes are never more than a couple hallways away, which really facilitates the kind of survival horror gameplay loop that this game is going for without making it a constant slog.
  • Established the Classic Formula – The quintessential “Resident Evil” formula is here and pretty much all intact, albeit in an unrefined state. That said, it’s kind of amazing how much the core gameplay of “ammo/health scarcity and exploring to find new items to unlock new areas” is still intact nearly thirty years later and as compelling as ever.
  • Some Unexpected QoL – Even here in the first entry, the game will tell you when a key item is no longer useful and allow you to immediately dispose of it. I was shocked by this, I’m used to games of this era being very unrefined and would have completely expected them to expect you to head back to an item box to deposit it. This is especially helpful in a game like this where inventory slots come at a premium and disposing of it automatically might mean that you now have room to pickup whatever new item is in the next room. Also, the Black Tiger boss fight ends with a door covered in spider webs, and the game helpfully provides you with a second combat knife so you know what you’re expected to do and to save you a trip to the item box. Handy!

Hate

  • REmake Exists – Without a doubt, the biggest issue the original Resident Evil faces is that you’re going to be constantly aware that a better version of this game exists. REmake is literally just Resident Evil, but with more content, phenomenal presentation, and better execution. Unlike Resident Evil 2 and 3, where their remakes are more reimaginings of the locations and concepts of those games, Resident Evil is left completely overshadowed. There isn’t much reason to go back to this version of the game other than the novelty of it and to laugh at the cheesiness.
  • Low HP – Compared to other Resident Evil games, you have shockingly low health reserves in this original entry. The first time I took a bit from a zombie and then realized I was already in the yellow, I knew something was up – and, remember, I was doing this playthrough as Chris, the character who is supposed to be significantly tankier. Jill has even less health than he does! Legitimately, you can’t take more than three zombie bites without dying in this game, which is kind of insane considering you can take that many hits in other Resident Evil games without even going into the yellow.
    • Just a note: I’ve read that you couldn’t shake off zombies in this particular entry, so you’ll always take full damage from them. However, this appears to be somewhat conflicting – some people say you can, some say that you can’t. I tried button mashing to push them off towards the end of the game when I became aware of this and didn’t notice a difference. I’m willing to own up if I’m wrong about this, but my opinion here was based on my experience in this playthrough.
  • Frustrating Early Game – The first thirty minutes or so of this game are incredibly irritating. Nearly every single door you come across is locked, you only have two viable paths to start exploring, there are zombies all over the place, and you are extremely limited on ammo. As even more of a piss-off, some of the paths you will HAVE to go at the start of the game have several zombies blocking the way, and each zombie takes at least six handgun rounds to kill, even if you’re also using the knife to soften them up. Basically, the start of this game requires either: 1) knowledge from previous playthroughs to know where to go and what you can afford to kill, 2) considerable trial and error, or 3) a walkthrough. This presents a massive hump to get over in order to actually start enjoying the game and I can see a good chunk of players just quitting in frustration right off the bat as a result.
  • Unrefined Design – Being the oldest game in the franchise, you can really feel the lack of refinement and QOL features which would quickly become standardized throughout the franchise. I don’t want to hold that too much against the game, but there are some particularly frustrating examples. Most egregious is the in-game map, which is about as bare-bones as it could possibly get. It shows the mansion layout, tells you what area you’re currently in, and what rooms you’ve visited… and that’s it. You can check other floors and areas, there’s no information about the names of the rooms, save points, item boxes, locked doors, etc. You’d legitimately be better off making your own map on paper while playing, that’s how archaic this game’s map is.
  • Presentation and Game Design – This is one of my harder-to-articulate complaints about this game, but I’ll try to explain it. I think that Resident Evil‘s fixed camera angles and tank controls were sensible and clever design choices given the technical restraints of the time. However, the way that these have been implemented here create more frustration that they needed to.
    • Pathways are often very narrow, making it difficult to dodge zombies without taking a hit or requiring gunning them down to pass safely (again, see my complaints about low HP and the early game lack of ammo for why this is such an issue). To make matters worse, the camera angles are often so zoomed out or angled in such a way that it can be difficult to judge exactly how much space you have to maneuver around a zombie, making you take hits that you could have dodged otherwise.
    • In addition, the graphics and camera angles combine to make it difficult to even see what paths you can take. On more than one occasion, I completely missed paths forward because they just blended into the background. This is especially pronounced in the underground, where the background textures are extra low-resolution and monotonous.
    • This can also make knowing what to interact with the the environment really frustrating. The most prominent example of this is the placement of the eagle and wolf crests on a fountain with four corners. I walked up to the first, most visible corner and nothing happened. Turns out that the game wants you to go to two other corners, whose points aren’t even on-screen when you reach them, and then interact with them know that’s where you’re supposed to put the crests. It is incredibly easy to miss this and I’m sure plenty of people got stuck wandering around trying to figure out where to go next.

All-in-all, the OG Resident Evil is still a pretty fun time, but you can really feel how unrefined and aged it is, even in comparison to its immediate follow-ups. While REmake is the best way to experience this game, there’s still some old-school charm to this original rendition which makes it worth playing through at least once.

Love/Hate: Resident Evil – Dead Aim

Welcome back to the Resident Evil love/hate series! In this entry we’ll be going over the third, and final, Survivor game, Resident Evil: Dead Aim! I’ve been pretty up-front with my thoughts on the first two Survivor games – they’re two of the worst games in this entire franchise little to no redeeming qualities between them. For Dead Aim, Capcom looked to shake up the formula a bit to try to finally make a Survivor game worth playing. Would third time be the charm, or is this yet another failure for this sub-series? Read on to find out…

Love

  • Morpheus – Hands-down, the most interesting and notable aspect of this game is its villain, Morpheus. This might seem kind of surprising at first glance, since Morpheus’s characterization is extremely shallow. The game’s opening blurb pretty much establishes their entire character and motivation: to create a kingdom where beauty has absolute authority. But then the game goes in a completely unexpected direction, as this guy injects themselves with this game’s virus and it causes them to… turn trans!? Like, I’m not even kidding either. Morpheus was introduced to us as a Sephiroth-style pretty-boy, but then they come out as a big booby Tyrant with goddamn biological heels (I’m going to go with “they” here simply because we never get a clear-cut answer about how they identify). It’s completely off the wall, but it’s a choice that makes Morpheus significantly more memorable and interesting than they have any right to be. It’s also kind of wild because of how well it’s handled – no one’s calling them a freak because of the change, they’re treated no differently than any other Resident Evil antagonist would be, and Morpheus seems to be living their best life because of it. I’m not even sure that it was the developers’ intent for this to be as positive a representation as it is, but for a game released in 2003, it’s pretty shocking to see. Hell, the game even seems to lean into it. You can’t tell me that the scene where Morpheus’s transformation is revealed, where this tall, booby trans woman turns Bruce into their bitch as he moans pathetically as he gets dominated isn’t meant to come across as kinda hot… and not even in a trans fetish way, I mean more in a general domination kink sort of way. Like I said, it’s kind of insane how well the trans aspect of the game comes across to me (although, to be fair, I’m not trans, so maybe I’m missing some key context). On top of all this, the section of the game where Morpheus stalks your character is legitimately intense, and they have easily the best boss fight in the entire game. Simply put, Morpheus is one of the most interesting Resident Evil villains, almost entirely due to the bonkers decisions they made with the characters, and then how well they managed to execute these decisions.
  • Bruce – Our hero, Bruce McGivern, is about the most stereotypical 2000s-era male you could imagine. Dude looks like the lead singer from Crossfade, an image which I have not been able to shake the entire time I played this game. Bruce is an American spy who is trying to stop Morpheus from unleashing a bio-terror attack on the world. He’s also a massive, bungling doofus, has an extremely weird vocal performance, is constantly getting clowned on by his rival and love interest, Fongling, and, as I stated previously, Morpheus absolutely turns him into their bitch… and, honestly, all this actually makes him kind of endearing. There’s a real charm and sincerity in seeing this dork stumble through mishap after mishap as he tries to save the day and it’s the kind of thing that you just never see from a Resident Evil hero.
  • The Map – Legitimately, Dead Aim has one of the best maps in the entire series. Every room you come across is labelled, making navigating to specific areas much easier. In addition, every locked door you come across with get marked on the map with a cool little scribble effect, like Bruce is updating it in real-time as you explore. He’ll also mark key doors, and circle areas of interest. It’s also great that the map is mapped to the select button for easy access. All-in-all, it’s just an extremely handy tool to have at your disposal and makes exploration less of a hassle.
  • Ambition – Look, the Resident Evil: Survivor games we’ve looked at so far have all been pretty different. The first game was kind of like a stripped-down Resident Evil game with more of an emphasis on shooting. Meanwhile, the second game was a full-tilt, run-and-gun, arcade light gun game. Dead Aim is more similar to the original Survivor game, but it’s very much its own beast. It adds first- and third-person gameplay elements, a stealth system, and a far more cinematic plot and narrative. I’ve actually heard it described as a prototype for Resident Evil 4… which is kind of insane to say, but also not entirely wrong either…? Even if its ideas aren’t always executed as well as one would hope, I appreciate just how far off the beaten path this game is willing to go; it makes Dead Aim a very unique entry in the sprawling Resident Evil franchise.

Mixed

  • Stealth – The aforementioned stealth system is pretty handy. Hold down X, L1, or L2, and you will begin sneaking around, making it a lot harder for enemies to hear you and making them less likely to aggro to you. You can get through the game without using it, but it definitely makes the game easier and you will waste significantly less ammo… however, there are a couple drawbacks. First of all, you’re moving a hell of a lot slower, so the game’s pace is also going to be slowed during general traversal. Secondly, sneaking around isn’t really all that fun, especially compared to blasting zombies.

Hate

  • The Story – The actual plot of Dead Aim is pretty standard spy thriller stuff: Morpheus is going to launch missiles when they reach their island base, it’s up to Bruce and Fongling to stop them. This is a good setup, but man is the story told poorly and barely develops at all (the only major plot points being: Morpheus infects themselves, the cruise ship crashes into Morpheus’s base and blows up, and the Chinese government make a deal with Morpheus and try to kill Fongling off). It also doesn’t help that the game completely bungles its opening. Instead of giving us any kind of setup to establish characters, the setting, plot threads, etc, instead the game starts in media res with Bruce already on Morpheus’s cruise ship and captured at gunpoint by the villain. Then Fongling immediately rescues him and the game starts, despite us having no fucking clue who any of these people are or what the hell is going on. It feels like we’re missing at least fifteen minutes of setup and doesn’t come across like it was an artistic choice – rather it feels like they were just trying to put in the minimum effort to get this story underway.
  • The Sounds – Dead Aim has some of the worst sounds for a major video game release that I’ve ever heard. First of all, the voice acting – I don’t think the performances here are bad like they are in some other Resident Evil games. However, they are recorded and/or mixed terribly (in the English release, at least). You can barely hear what Bruce or Fongling are saying half the time. On top of that, there are all sorts of bizarre and unpleasant sound choices in this game. Most infuriating, most of the cabins on the cruise ship have this awful high-pitched sound that plays the entire time you’re in the room for some godawful reason. In addition, enemies have an incredibly limited pool of sound effects, so you will hear the same zombie sound over, and over, and over, and over, ad nauseum. I’ve also got to say that Pluto, the morbidly obese zombie, makes the weirdest fucking sounds that I’ve ever heard in a zombie game when he’s chasing after you. It gets incredibly annoying and makes this boss fight even more annoying than it already is.
  • The Length – Once again, we have an insanely short Survivor game, clocking in under two hours total playtime. For me, it took 1 hour and 43 minutes, which is just nuts. Unlike the original Survivor, there aren’t even any branching paths to incentivize replays. Perhaps the craziest part to me is that there doesn’t seem to be much reason for the game to be this short? Like, there are plenty of opportunities to pad out the length if they wanted to and allow us to take more time exploring areas, solving puzzles, fighting enemies… y’know, Resident Evil stuff. Instead, the game has a break-neck pace as it blasts through areas with little pomp or circumstance. Like, at one point, I fought a boss and then like two minutes later I was fighting another, completely separate boss who was only like one locked door away. Does it not make sense to space these kinds of big moments apart more, or is that just me…? All I can think is that Dead Aim was incredibly limited for cash and/or has a concrete release date, so they had to cut a lot of corners and use only what they had for the final product (which would also explain some of the story issues).
  • The Controls – Dead Aim has some really strange controls. I’ll admit that some of this comes down to me not having a Guncon 2 to play the game on, but this isn’t really an excuse. Halo: Combat Evolved had been out for two years when this game came out, so there’s no reason for the game’s controller support to be any worse than that. Anyway, the game uses tank controls like every other Resident Evil game up until that point. In addition, you can hold X or L2 to sneak and strafe, while holding L1 will allow you to sneak… but, for some reason, you’ll only be able to move forward and backwards? Not sure why this is even a thing, but it’s here. In order to go into first person mode to shoot enemies, you need to tap R1, and then use the right stick to move your reticle. Want to leave first person mode? You have to press… down on the D-pad. Oh, but pressing left or right on the D-pad will allow you to move the reticle as well…??? Pressing R1 again will allow you to shoot. You can also hold X to strafe in first person mode, or you can also press X to dodge (although the timing is pretty tough to nail). Look, this control scheme works, but is it good? I would say that it is not, lots of its features feel redundant, contradictory, and/or unintuitive and I don’t know how many times I accidentally wasted bullets forgetting that you had to press a different button to close first person view.
  • The Environments – The cruise ship is kind of an interesting area to explore, but even at that point in the game, you can feel how much of the environments are being recycled over and over. This just gets worse as the game goes on, as you pass through identical areas with even less variation to them.
  • The Subtitles – Look, how fucking bad does your game have to be when I’m out here complaining about the goddamn subtitles?! Dead Aim has that infuriating issue with imported Japanese media where the subtitles do not match up with the dialogue. I’m assuming that this is down to different localization teams who, for some godforsaken reason, decided to translate the Japanese dialogue for the subtitles, and then localized the dialogue separately. It makes the awful sound mixing for the dialogue even worse, since you can’t tell what exactly is being said at all times, but it sure as hell is not lining up with what the subtitles are telling you is being said.
  • The Assault Rifle – I’d like to know who the bastard was who decided that every single round fired from every gun in the game needs to make the screen flash white. The reason for this is because the assault rifle, a rapid-fire weapon that holds 100 rounds of ammunition at a time, turns into a fucking seizure-inducing, eye-ball searing nightmare every time it is fired. Making matters worse, it’s an incredibly powerful gun that you kind of need in order to win some of the tougher boss fights, so you’re pretty much going to have to use it at some point, even if it will leave you a frothing, twitching mess in its wake.
  • The Facial Animations – This might sound like a weird complaint, but Dead Aim might just have the worst facial animation I’ve ever seen in a game. Bruce and Fongling are constantly making the weirdest, most unnatural faces that I’ve ever seen (and, in Fongling’s case, they’d feel borderline offensive if they weren’t clearly just the work of crunch and/or incompetence). The end result is that it becomes even harder to take either of these characters seriously.
  • The Sewers – Resident Evil games are notorious for having bad sewer levels, but this game’s sewer section is easily the worst in the entire series. There are a hell of a lot of reasons for this too:
    • First of all, the game suddenly becomes very stingy with ammo out of nowhere. Ammo was reasonably plentiful on the cruise ship, but here you simply will not find enough ammo to kill most of the creatures you come across, let alone have enough to deal with the level-end boss. To make matters worse, if you waste your high-powered ammo down here then you’re a sucker, because what little ammo you do find is going to be mostly for your handgun. Joy.
    • Secondly, the sewer layout is maze-like, but you’re going to very quickly realize just how linear and repetitive it is. Seriously, there’s only one path forward, and you’re not going to be able to more than a few steps off the path without finding that the way forward is blocked and/or locked behind a grate. As a result, when you enter an area, you can just look at your map and pretty much be able to tell which way you can go without even being able to see which doors and routes are blocked yet.
    • Thirdly, this area is full of Glimmers, one of the absolute worst enemies in the entire franchise. These Hunter variants are a massive pain in the ass – they hide in the dark, so you can barely see them, they take a ton of ammo to put down, and they’re incredibly fast, so you have a literal fraction of a second to react before they sprint across the entire room at you in the blink of an eye and grapple you. The concept of a cautious, stalking enemy is really cool, but fighting Glimmers ends up being complete bullshit here in execution. Even the Resident Evil wiki says to just avoid them, because fighting is a waste of time and ammo.
    • Finally, the whole area is capped off with a boss fight with the aforementioned Pluto, a very fat zombie who hunts you through sound. Again, cool concept, but my God is the execution awful. If he hears you, you will take damage. However, you get a silenced pistol very early in the game, so you can trivialize the entire fight by staying far away, and sniping his head with dozens of pistol shots over, and over, and over again. It makes for a tedious joke of a boss fight, to the point where I had killed him and didn’t even realize it until the cutscene started playing about ten seconds later.
  • The Game Incentivizes You to Not Play It – When I first got to play as Fongling, I had been given an assault rifle and a ton of zombies. “Cool,” I thought, “the game’s letting me have a power fantasy where I get to let rip with this gun against a horde of enemies”. Only, no, it turns out that I’m actually an idiot. Later, when I play as Fongling again, she was still out of ammo and was stuck with just her pistol. She never gets more ammo for the assault rifle and never gets any other gun for the rest of the game, making some of the sections where you play as her harder if you wasted her ammo earlier in the game, like a fucking idiot. What did you think I was playing, a light gun shooter!? That’s when it dawned on me: if you’re even bothering to fight enemies in this game, you’re a sucker. Even basic zombies take a stupid amount of ammo to down, you only get to carry six boxes of ammo of any type at a time, non-handgun ammo is exceedingly rare, and if you run out of bullets, there’s no melee option, meaning you are just plain fucked. Literally, the best course of action in this game is to shoot only enemies that cannot be avoided without taking damage. In all other cases, running or sneaking past them is always the best course of action. Again, this is supposed to be a light gun game. For all its faults, at least the original Survivor nailed the idea that you were supposed to want to kill the zombies. This also, obviously, just makes a content-bereft game even shorter and hollow, which is about the last thing it needed.

I appreciate just how bizarre and unique Dead Aim is within the Resident Evil franchise. However, it really fails to elevate the Survivor sub-series out of the depths of the garbage bin it had been residing in. I do think it’s probably the best of these three games, but it’s still easily one of the worst games in the franchise all things considered. Still, there’s not other game quite like it, so it’s certainly worth experiencing, if only to see all the bonkers decisions put into it.

Love/Hate: Resident Evil Survivor 2 – Code: Veronica

Welcome back to the Resident Evil love/hate series! In this entry we’ll be going over one of the most obscure titles in this franchise, Resident Evil Survivor 2 – Code: Veronica! The original Survivor is, by far, one of the worst games in this entire franchise. However, this was largely down to the execution being really poor, so the prospect of seeing the concept of “first person shooter Resident Evil game” get another try was an intriguing one at least. Could Survivor 2 do what its predecessor could not? Read on to find out…

Note: I did not play this game with a light gun. This may colour my opinions on this game somewhat, but I honestly doubt it. This is not a game where precision matters (even moreso than the original Survivor), and I just can’t see how a light gun would make an appreciable difference compared to a controller as a result. All opinions here are made under the assumption that I’m experiencing this game using a controller.

Love

Umm… this is a first for the Love/Hate series. Nothing. There’s nothing I love about this game. In every other piece of media I’ve covered, no matter how much I hated that media, there was always something nice I could say about it. This is the first time where I sit down, try to think of anything nice I could say, and cannot. Any positive thing I can think of is then immediately spoiled as I remember some major caveat that pushes it into “mixed”.

So, yeah, buckle in…

Mixed

  • The Controls – Survivor 2 came out right before Halo: Combat Evolved released and nailed down how to design a shooter for console. Unfortunately, that means that Survivor 2 has a really weird control scheme by modern standards. Left analog stick moves your character, right analog stick… does nothing. No, you need to use L1 and R1 to turn your character, and then square to shoot. I kinda see what they were going for, and in a vacuum it’s a reasonably ergonomic layout, but it feels so foreign to a modern gamer’s mindset. In fact, I had to go into my emulation settings and change all my button inputs to make it more natural to me. Even then, I managed to break the R2 button on my RP4+ playing this game from the constant gunfire spam. All the more reason for me to hate it I guess.
  • AI Partner – Survivor 2 lets you have an AI-controlled partner with you at all times, which is helpful for providing some extra fire or drawing enemy aggro. I legitimately like having them there, but their AI is also dumber than a sack of bricks. In particular, if you end up against any kind of strong enemy (particularly against end-of-level bosses or Nemesis), they’ll run right into them and die very quickly because they don’t know enough to run.

Hate

  • Pathetic Playtime – Look, I’m not someone who rags on about gameplay length. I tend to prefer a short game so I can move on to something else. However, even I have my limits: Survivor 2‘s campaign lasts approximately 40 minutes. I’VE LASTED LONGER THAN 40 MINUTES! Like, I’ve legitimately lost more time in Fallout 3 forgetting to save and then dying than I would get from the playtime of this game. The reason it’s so short? There are only five levels and they all last mere minutes.* I had to think about how much I’d hold this against the game – it was, after all, designed as an arcade cabinet game first and foremost. There’s a different sort of design philosophy there and a shorter runtime would be expected. However, even with that in mind, I can’t give Survivor 2 a pass. First of all, it was released as a full boxed game in Japan and Europe, so it should be treated like any other full release title. Even taking into account its arcade game status, it’s not even good when compared to other arcade games. Furthermore, it’s not like they adapted the entirety of Code: Veronica in those five levels and that’s the length the game had to be as a result. No, they only adapt the first half of the game! We never even go to Antarctica! Did they develop this game in six months…? All I can say is “What the fuck?” over and over again.
  • Mindless Gameplay – Survivor 2 is about as mindless as a game can get. At least the original Survivor was trying to stick to the classic Resident Evil gameplay formula, but Survivor 2 is straight-up as mindless a shooter as you can get. Gameplay consists of going from point A, to point B, to point C, all while shooting every single thing in sight and trying not to get hit back. Levels are very short. There are no puzzles. There is no real reason to explore, other than finding gem collectables. The game doesn’t even want you to explore, as it has painted the floors with arrows pointing to your objective. It’s just a mindless gauntlet that becomes more frustrating as it goes.
  • Enemies Are Wasted – Perhaps the weirdest thing about Survivor 2‘s length is how much the game actively avoids stretching it out. For what it’s worth, Survivor 2 has a fantastic roster of enemy types which could easily support a much longer game’s runtime. However, most games will slowly introduce you to new enemy types so you can learn to get good against them. Survivor 2 is playing like a meth addict, throwing new enemy types at you every 30 seconds, only for them to die in mere seconds and then never be seen again. It’s baffling, I don’t know what else to say about it.
  • Feels Recycled – This is a weird thing to say about a game, but trust me, if you played Survivor 2, you would feel it. As far as I can tell, 99% of this game’s assets are taken directly from Code: Veronica and the Dreamcast ports of Resident Evil 2 and 3, with the menu UI and the map system being the only parts that I can see which are wholly original to this game. On the one hand, this is kind of a cool way for Resident Evil fans to see Code: Veronica up close in a way that was impossible before. However, this also means that every stage in this game is literally played on Code: Veronica’s existing maps. THEY’VE FRANKENSTEINED A SHOOTER OUT OF A GAME WORLD DESIGNED FOR SURVIVAL HORROR. This means loading screens every five seconds as you go through a door. This means constantly seeing in-game models which were never designed to be seen this close. This means finding yourself asking why the hell Lickers and Nemesis appear in this game. All I can think is that they just used what they had and didn’t do a single thing more than they had to to ship a minimum viable product.
  • No Voice Acting – It’s really awkward when you start playing this game and see Claire and Steve meet up and their lips are moving… but nothing’s happening. On the plus side, this does mean we’re spared Steve’s voice acting again, but it’s very jarring not being able to hear them speak after I just got done playing Code: Veronica proper.
  • No Stage Select – Much like the original Survivor, if you die in Survivor 2 and run out of lives, it’s game over, back to start. Even though you’re likely to only lose about 15 minutes of progress, that’s still 15 minutes of bullshit to get back where I was. You either get gud, or stop playing. Well, I’ll be honest here, I got through four levels and then died. I was done, I don’t even feel the need to see this final level. The whole thing’s the bloody same shit over and over, there’s no reason for me to believe it will change at all.

Despite all my rage, I honestly don’t think that Resident Evil Survivor 2 is the worst Resident Evil game. Umbrella Corps is still the reigning champion, due to how much more baffling it is that it was bad, and also because the state of its online mode even shortly after launch hampered it significantly. That said, when, in comparison, I find myself suddenly saying nice things about the original Survivor, you know you fucked up badly.

*Your mom lasted mere minutes.

Love/Hate: Resident Evil – Code: Veronica X

Welcome back to the Resident Evil love/hate series! It has been quite a while since the last entry, but I’m finally ready and able to continue the series with Resident Evil – Code: Veronica X! This is another one of those Resident Evil games that I owned and tried to play through several times (my most recent abandoned attempt being back at the start of 2023), but never made it more than an hour in. However, much like REmake, those failed attempts all made this final attempt go much more smoothly – I knew more-or-less what I needed to do at the start of the game, which allowed me to get over the early game hump of not wasting ammo and health. Practice from previous attempts also meant that I didn’t struggle with the tank controls either and acclimated to them very quickly. Having played through the whole thing now, how does Code: Veronica X hold up? Read on to find out…

Love

  • Classic Gameplay – Code: Veronica is the oldest mainline Resident Evil game with no remake, which means that it also has the most “classic” gameplay formula for anyone wanting to play through the story of the series’ main entries. This also means that it’s the only mainline entry where tank controls are mandatory. While this will definitely be a hang-up for some, I had fun acclimating to them and, after a couple short attempts, they finally “clicked” and I had basically no issue with them through the entire experience. It makes me excited to go into the PS1 Resident Evil games and Outbreak now that I’ve got this down pat. Code: Veronica is definitely less polished and refined than REmake, but the classic Resident Evil formula is still executed well and is really fun.
  • Wesker – Albert Wesker was a decent villain in the first Resident Evil game, but he got clowned on by his own monster. The Wesker we know today though? He came into his own in Code: Veronica. This is the first time he really became King Shit as he laughs maniacally and monologues while beating the tar out of Claire and Chris Redfield. He gets some classic lines and cool new powers that helped establish him as the franchise’s greatest villain.
  • Claire – I really like Claire’s character design here, it’s probably my favourite look for her in the whole series. You can really see how her experiences in Raccoon City have jaded her and turned her into a full-on action heroine badass, best exemplified by the Matrix-inspired opening cinematic.
  • The Story – I almost always rag on the stories in Resident Evil games, even in the franchise’s best-regarded games. They just tend to be poorly told, disjointed nonsense when you apply any thought to them, or they have an interesting story happening in the background which the main story barely bumps up against. However, Code: Veronica seems to have struck a good balance between a story that’s relatively simple and straight-forward (escape the prison/Antarctic base), while also weaving the series’ larger lore into the main plot in a way that makes it all more interesting. Towards the end, Code: Veronica turns into a full-on succession war between the Ashfords and Albert Wesker to see who will control the BOW market in the wake of the Raccoon City incident, and seeing that play out in front of us instead of through optional files is pretty exciting to see play out. On top of that, there are a few good, unexpected twists that keep things interesting and a fairly coherent narrative throughout. All-in-all, it makes for a story that is easily one of the most interesting and memorable in the whole franchise.
  • Nosferatu – If we’re being honest, this boss fight is kind of bullshit. The boss has a poison spray attack that is nigh-on unavoidable and very long-ranged attacks that mean you can barely even see the boss before he can damage you, and he can instant-kill you if you’re too close to the edge of the platform. However, I don’t mind too much in the end because Nosferatu has an awesome, exceptionally creepy creature design – easily one of the coolest monsters in the whole franchise. On top of that, the fight has fantastic atmosphere, taking place in a blizzard as you try to find Nosferatu in first-person view and shoot him in his weak point. Even though I kept dying cheaply to this guy, I couldn’t help but have a good time each time I replayed the fight.
  • Checkpoints – Code: Veronica has added a checkpoint system which makes dying against bosses less of a pain in the ass. Instead of being kicked back to the last save room (however long ago that was), most bosses will have a checkpoint sometime before the boss that you can start at, making these showdowns less frustrating. The game also doesn’t kick you back to the main menu every time you die, which makes dying slightly less rage-inducing.

Mixed

  • Graphics – On the one hand, Code: Veronica is a pretty big step up from the PS1 trilogy in terms of its graphical fidelity. Technology had also increased enough where backgrounds were no longer pre-rendered and were now being done in real-time, which means that the camera can also freely move at times and there’s no more “loading stutter” whenever the camera angle shifts. However, this is a bit of a mixed bag for me in the end. For one thing, being a Dreamcast and early PS2 game, Code: Veronica is, graphically, in the transition period between what PS1 games were doing and what PS2 games would end up looking like. As a result, it looks kind of pathetic in comparison to REmake and 0, which came out only 2 years later (or 1 year if you played Code: Veronica on PS2). That’s not really the game’s fault, but what is the game’s fault is that the ability to move the camera isn’t really explored at all. Fixed camera angles were a necessity of PS1 technical limitations and pre-rendered backgrounds, but if you have this world entirely rendered in real-time, there isn’t really much of a reason for this game to continue sticking it fixed camera angles. The camera just kind of works within the general framework of fixed angles, moving on occasion, but then switching angles as needed because that’s the expectation for the series. This makes all the occasions where you get damaged by an enemy your character could see, but you can’t because it’s off-screen, all the more egregious than they were in previous Resident Evil games.
  • Alfred Ashford – Our initial antagonist in the game, Alfred Ashford, is a foppish, annoying, effeminate, borderline-offensive cartoon villain… but I can’t really bring myself to hate him like I do the Leech Controller in Resident Evil 0. I think it’s because it was entirely intentional for him to be eccentric and pathetic, so he ends up being almost endearing as a result. Definitely one of the worst Resident Evil villains, but he’s at a level of derpiness that I could see me really leaning into the character someday.

Hate

  • Steve – Sigh. As soon as I heard this guy’s vocal performance, I knew I was in for a rough ride. Steve sounds like an early 2000s Final Fantasy/shonen anime hero, complete with squeaky, nasally voice, melodramatics, and his obsession with dual-wielding guns at all times. Unfortunately, it’s not just his vocal performance that does him in. The writers clearly want you to like Steve, giving him a very tragic backstory, moments of over-the-top badassery, and forcing a romance between him and Claire. Uuuuunfortunately, this all fails miserably because you can’t take his vocal performance seriously and the writing of the character just doesn’t work. Like, that “romance” between him and Claire? The “build-up” for this romance is him trying to kiss Claire when she’s sleeping, then telling her he loves her when he’s dying. It just doesn’t work and there is little indication that Claire looks at him with anything more than pity. All that said though, Steve makes for a goldmine of memes. Going into a PTSD meltdown because he has to shoot his zombie dad? Hilarious. Being told that “Steve is suffering” as we try to free him from a room full of poison gas? I’m literally on the floor laughing. Steve gets distracted staring at Claire’s ass, causing their getaway vehicle to crash, releasing a cloud of poison gas that Claire gets stuck dealing with? Comedy gold.
  • You Kind of Need a Walkthrough – Code: Veronica is one of those games where you can find yourself screwed over through no fault of your own because of a sudden difficulty spike or completely unpredictable change in the way that the game works, and you just are expected to deal with it. If you’ve already played through the game, this isn’t a big deal, but if you go in completely blind, you might find yourself having to replay massive chunks of the game, if not restarting entirely.
    • The first big instance of this is the Tyrant fight on the plane. It’s a sudden and massive difficulty spike that is beyond anything else you faced in the game to this point (and, arguably, at any other point). This sonofabitch can stun-lock you to get off two colossal hits in succession. Given that it only takes three or four hits from it to die, this is incredibly frustrating. Your goal in this fight is to launch it out of the plane by activating a catapult system to throw a crate into it. Each time this is activated, you need to wait about thirty seconds for it to recharge before you can launch it again, during which time you need to avoid getting hit and launch as much damage as you can at the Tyrant to wear it down enough for the next crate to take it out. This can take anywhere from two to five launches to pull off, and if you used all your grenade launcher or explosive arrow ammo earlier, then sucks to be you. This difficulty spike can straight-up soft-lock you if you didn’t conserve your ammo and healing well enough up to this point.
    • About halfway through the game, you switch from playing as Claire to Chris. Chris has access to Claire’s item box, but I sure hope you weren’t holding onto your best weapons and all your healing items when you were playing as Claire (which is quite likely, because you switch right after the Nosferatu boss fight). Chris can get by without Claire’s best weapons, but it definitely makes playing as him harder than it needs to be, purely because you had no way of knowing that this switch-up was happening.
    • Likewise, later in the game you switch back to Claire, briefly. Once again, you don’t have access to any weapons or items Chris had and, when you switch back to Chris, any items you take with you will be gone for good. This sequence also has a nasty action sequence against mutant-Steve where you die in only two hits, and you’re going to be hit at least two or three times (if not more). Again, I sure hope that you have enough healing items, or you are literally screwed here.
    • On the smaller end of things, there’s a metal detector early in the game where you have to stash all metal objects on you before you can enter. Not only can you easily forget any important items you left here, but there’s a fire extinguisher you’re likely going to put here after using it, which you actually need to bring with you to Antarctica as Chris in order to get the strongest gun in the game and make the final boss fights significantly easier. This one’s kind of easy to miss, but it’s also kind of bullshit that they’d hinge the best endgame weapon on whether you remembered to grab a seemingly-useless key item hours earlier and put it in your item box until it became useful again. The ID Card sure as hell didn’t do anything after its one short usage (in fact, I accidentally mixed it up with the Security Card, so it actually was a pain in my ass that I still had it at the end of the game)…
  • Bandersnatches – These ugly bastards are a pain in the ass. On the one hand, I appreciate that they don’t do much damage to you, but they will constantly attack you from long range, will stagger you with each hit, and are almost-always doing so from off-screen. They’re just a massive pain to deal with every time you see one and are often not worth the ammo and health you’d need to waste to actually kill them.
  • Unmemorable Locales – Compared to the Spencer Mansion and RPD, the locales in Code: Veronica are not particularly memorable. A prison and an Antarctic base should be really cool areas for a Resident Evil game, but the way they have been designed here doesn’t really do the premise justice. I think the main issue is that the Spencer Mansion and RPD have a main, central hub area that all paths branch outward from and then loop back to. In contrast, Rockfort Prison, the Palace, and the Military Training Facility are three separate compounds which you cycle between (and which take about a minute of travel time each time you go to change areas). On top of this, when you play as Chris, a lot of your routes you memorized suddenly change and get blocked off, making it really hard to remember where exactly you need to go to get to a particular destination.
  • Chris – This one is a bit unfortunate. On the one hand, I think that Code: Veronica might be Chris at his most likeable. He’s straight-up the all-American action hero that he should be, actually getting to interact with Claire also makes him the world’s best big brother, and he also gets a personal antagonist in Wesker. Unfortunately, the mid-point twist where you start playing as him and then realize that they’ve transported you back to the prison right after we’d gotten all excited about escaping was not a great decision. It ends up dragging the prison section out for another hour and a half and feels completely superfluous, like they were stalling for time and reusing as many assets as they could. It also rubs me the wrong way that, as soon as Chris shows up, Claire is completely upstaged for the rest of the game. She basically gets turned into a damsel in distress from that point forward and lets Chris do all the work. I remember when Kaya Scodelario said that Claire doesn’t get to do much after Resident Evil 2 and wanted to change that if they made more sequels to Welcome to Raccoon City, to which Resident Evil nerds went “umm, have you not heard of Code: Veronica and Revelations 2?!” To which I can now confidently say: Claire gets shafted halfway through this game and is easily the most superfluous character in Revelations 2. Kaya’s right, and if we do get more movies with her as Claire, I wouldn’t be opposed to seeing some changes made.

I’ll be honest, I went into Code: Veronica not expecting to like it too much. It’s one of those games that has been hyped up for me for years by certain people, but I’d also heard other people who said really mixed things about it. As a result, I went in with a more critical bias against it. However, I was pleasantly surprised to find that I really did dig it. I wouldn’t say it’s one of the best in the whole franchise by any means, but it is a really fun, solid entry that is well worth playing through when you’re ready to dive into the “classic” Resident Evil entries.